All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>,
	Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microchip.com>,
	Scott Teel <scott.teel@microchip.com>,
	Justin.Lindley@microchip.com,
	Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@microchip.com>,
	gerry.morong@microchip.com,
	Mahesh Rajashekhara <mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>,
	hch@infradead.org, joseph.szczypek@hpe.com, POSWALD@suse.com,
	"James E. J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, it+linux-scsi@molgen.mpg.de,
	Donald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 15/25] smartpqi: fix host qdepth limit
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 18:54:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddd8bca4-2ae7-a2dc-cca6-0a2ff85a7d35@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160763254769.26927.9249430312259308888.stgit@brunhilda>

Dear Don, dear Mahesh,


Am 10.12.20 um 21:35 schrieb Don Brace:
> From: Mahesh Rajashekhara <mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>
> 
> * Correct scsi-mid-layer sending more requests than
>    exposed host Q depth causing firmware ASSERT issue.
>    * Add host Qdepth counter.

This supposedly fixes the regression between Linux 5.4 and 5.9, which we 
reported in [1].

     kernel: smartpqi 0000:89:00.0: controller is offline: status code 
0x6100c
     kernel: smartpqi 0000:89:00.0: controller offline

Thank you for looking into this issue and fixing it. We are going to 
test this.

For easily finding these things in the git history or the WWW, it would 
be great if these log messages could be included (in the future).

Also, that means, that the regression is still present in Linux 5.10, 
released yesterday, and this commit does not apply to these versions.

Mahesh, do you have any idea, what commit caused the regression and why 
the issue started to show up?

James, Martin, how are regressions handled for the SCSI subsystem?

Regarding the diff, personally, I find the commit message much too 
terse. `pqi_scsi_queue_command()` will return `SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY` 
for the case of too many requests. Will that be logged by Linux in some 
log level? In my opinion it points to a performance problem, and should 
be at least logged as a notice or warning.

Can `ctrl_info->scsi_ml_can_queue` be queried somehow maybe in the logs? 
`sudo find /sys -name queue` did not display something interesting.

[1]: https://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=160271263114829&w=2
      "Linux 5.9: smartpqi: controller is offline: status code 0x6100c"

> Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh <scott.benesh@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.teel@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Barnett <kevin.barnett@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mahesh Rajashekhara <mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com>
> Signed-off-by: Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h      |    2 ++
>   drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c |   19 ++++++++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> index 0b94c755a74c..c3b103b15924 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi.h
> @@ -1345,6 +1345,8 @@ struct pqi_ctrl_info {
>   	struct work_struct ofa_quiesce_work;
>   	u32		ofa_bytes_requested;
>   	u16		ofa_cancel_reason;
> +
> +	atomic_t	total_scmds_outstanding;
>   };

What is the difference between the already existing

     atomic_t scsi_cmds_outstanding;

and the new counter?

     atomic_t	total_scmds_outstanding;

The names are quite similar, so different names or a comment might be 
useful.

>   
>   enum pqi_ctrl_mode {
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> index 082b17e9bd80..4e088f47d95f 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/smartpqi/smartpqi_init.c
> @@ -5578,6 +5578,8 @@ static inline bool pqi_is_bypass_eligible_request(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>   void pqi_prep_for_scsi_done(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>   {
>   	struct pqi_scsi_dev *device;
> +	struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info;
> +	struct Scsi_Host *shost;
>   
>   	if (!scmd->device) {
>   		set_host_byte(scmd, DID_NO_CONNECT);
> @@ -5590,7 +5592,11 @@ void pqi_prep_for_scsi_done(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> +	shost = scmd->device->host;

The function already has a variable `device`, which is assigned 
“hostdata” though:

     device = scmd->device->hostdata;

This confuses me. Maybe this should be cleaned up in a followup commit, 
and the variable device be reused above in the `shost` assignment.

> +	ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);
> +
>   	atomic_dec(&device->scsi_cmds_outstanding);
> +	atomic_dec(&ctrl_info->total_scmds_outstanding);
>   }
>   
>   static bool pqi_is_parity_write_stream(struct pqi_ctrl_info *ctrl_info,
> @@ -5678,6 +5684,7 @@ static int pqi_scsi_queue_command(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scm
>   	bool raid_bypassed;
>   
>   	device = scmd->device->hostdata;
> +	ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);
>   
>   	if (!device) {
>   		set_host_byte(scmd, DID_NO_CONNECT);
> @@ -5686,8 +5693,11 @@ static int pqi_scsi_queue_command(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scm
>   	}
>   
>   	atomic_inc(&device->scsi_cmds_outstanding);
> -
> -	ctrl_info = shost_to_hba(shost);

I believe, style changes (re-ordering) in commits fixing regressions 
make it harder to backport it.

> +	if (atomic_inc_return(&ctrl_info->total_scmds_outstanding) >
> +		ctrl_info->scsi_ml_can_queue) {
> +		rc = SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
>   
>   	if (pqi_ctrl_offline(ctrl_info) || pqi_device_in_remove(device)) {
>   		set_host_byte(scmd, DID_NO_CONNECT);
> @@ -5730,8 +5740,10 @@ static int pqi_scsi_queue_command(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct scsi_cmnd *scm
>   	}
>   
>   out:
> -	if (rc)
> +	if (rc) {
>   		atomic_dec(&device->scsi_cmds_outstanding);
> +		atomic_dec(&ctrl_info->total_scmds_outstanding);
> +	}
>   
>   	return rc;
>   }
> @@ -8054,6 +8066,7 @@ static struct pqi_ctrl_info *pqi_alloc_ctrl_info(int numa_node)
>   
>   	INIT_WORK(&ctrl_info->event_work, pqi_event_worker);
>   	atomic_set(&ctrl_info->num_interrupts, 0);
> +	atomic_set(&ctrl_info->total_scmds_outstanding, 0);
>   
>   	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctrl_info->rescan_work, pqi_rescan_worker);
>   	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ctrl_info->update_time_work, pqi_update_time_worker);


Kind regards,

Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-14 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 20:34 [PATCH V3 00/25] smartpqi updates Don Brace
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 01/25] smartpqi: add support for product id Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:43   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 02/25] smartpqi: refactor aio submission code Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:43   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 03/25] smartpqi: refactor build sg list code Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:43   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 04/25] smartpqi: add support for raid5 and raid6 writes Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-08 22:56     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-13 10:26       ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 05/25] smartpqi: add support for raid1 writes Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-09 16:56     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:34 ` [PATCH V3 06/25] smartpqi: add support for BMIC sense feature cmd and feature bits Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-11 17:22     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-22 16:45     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-22 19:04       ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 07/25] smartpqi: update AIO Sub Page 0x02 support Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:44   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-11 20:53     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 08/25] smartpqi: add support for long firmware version Don Brace
2021-01-07 16:45   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-11 22:25     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-22 20:01     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 09/25] smartpqi: align code with oob driver Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:13   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 10/25] smartpqi: add stream detection Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:14   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-15 21:58     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 11/25] smartpqi: add host level stream detection enable Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:13   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-12 20:28     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 12/25] smartpqi: enable support for NVMe encryption Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:14   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 13/25] smartpqi: disable write_same for nvme hba disks Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:13   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 14/25] smartpqi: fix driver synchronization issues Don Brace
2021-01-07 23:32   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-08  4:13     ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-01-15 21:13     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-27 23:01     ` Don.Brace
     [not found]       ` <c1e6b199f5ccda5ccec5223dfcbd1fba22171c86.camel@suse.com>
2021-02-01 22:47         ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 15/25] smartpqi: fix host qdepth limit Don Brace
2020-12-14 17:54   ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2020-12-15 20:23     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-07 23:43       ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-15 21:17         ` Don.Brace
2021-01-19 10:33           ` John Garry
2021-01-19 14:12             ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-19 17:43               ` Paul Menzel
2021-01-20 16:42               ` Donald Buczek
2021-01-20 17:03                 ` Don.Brace
2021-01-20 18:35                 ` Martin Wilck
2021-02-10 15:27             ` Don.Brace
2021-02-10 15:42               ` John Garry
2021-02-10 16:29                 ` Don.Brace
2021-03-29 21:15                   ` Paul Menzel
2021-03-29 21:16                     ` Paul Menzel
2021-03-30 14:37                       ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 16/25] smartpqi: convert snprintf to scnprintf Don Brace
2021-01-07 23:51   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:35 ` [PATCH V3 17/25] smartpqi: change timing of release of QRM memory during OFA Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:14   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-27 17:46     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 18/25] smartpqi: return busy indication for IOCTLs when ofa is active Don Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 19/25] smartpqi: add phy id support for the physical drives Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:03   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 20/25] smartpqi: update sas initiator_port_protocols and target_port_protocols Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:12   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 21/25] smartpqi: add additional logging for LUN resets Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:27   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-25 17:09     ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 22/25] smartpqi: update enclosure identifier in sysf Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:30   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-25 17:13     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-25 19:44       ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-25 20:36         ` Don.Brace
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 23/25] smartpqi: correct system hangs when resuming from hibernation Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:34   ` Martin Wilck
2021-01-27 17:39     ` Don.Brace
2021-01-27 17:45       ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 24/25] smartpqi: add new pci ids Don Brace
2021-01-08  0:35   ` Martin Wilck
2020-12-10 20:36 ` [PATCH V3 25/25] smartpqi: update version to 2.1.6-005 Don Brace
2020-12-21 14:31 ` [PATCH V3 00/25] smartpqi updates Donald Buczek
     [not found]   ` <SN6PR11MB2848D8C9DF9856A2B7AA69ACE1C00@SN6PR11MB2848.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-12-22 13:13     ` Donald Buczek
2020-12-28 15:57       ` Don.Brace
2020-12-28 19:25         ` Don.Brace
2020-12-28 22:36           ` Donald Buczek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddd8bca4-2ae7-a2dc-cca6-0a2ff85a7d35@molgen.mpg.de \
    --to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=Justin.Lindley@microchip.com \
    --cc=POSWALD@suse.com \
    --cc=buczek@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=don.brace@microchip.com \
    --cc=gerry.morong@microchip.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=it+linux-scsi@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joseph.szczypek@hpe.com \
    --cc=kevin.barnett@microchip.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahesh.rajashekhara@microchip.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=scott.benesh@microchip.com \
    --cc=scott.teel@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.