From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752272AbdFZWvE (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:51:04 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:28721 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751478AbdFZWua (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:50:30 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,397,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="117715470" From: Tom Zanussi To: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mhiramat@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org, vedang.patel@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Tom Zanussi Subject: [PATCH 17/32] tracing: Account for variables in named trigger compatibility Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:49:18 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.3 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Named triggers must also have the same set of variables in order to be considered compatible - update the trigger match test to account for that. The reason for this requirement is that named triggers with variables are meant to allow one or more events to set the same variable. Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi --- kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c index 75cac76..fa8f607 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c @@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@ static int event_hist_trigger_print(struct seq_file *m, sort_key = &hist_data->sort_keys[i]; idx = sort_key->field_idx; - if (WARN_ON(idx >= TRACING_MAP_FIELDS_MAX)) + if (WARN_ON(idx >= HIST_FIELDS_MAX)) return -EINVAL; if (i > 0) @@ -1733,6 +1733,12 @@ static bool hist_trigger_match(struct event_trigger_data *data, return false; if (key_field->is_signed != key_field_test->is_signed) return false; + if ((key_field->var.name && !key_field_test->var.name) || + (!key_field->var.name && key_field_test->var.name)) + return false; + if ((key_field->var.name && key_field_test->var.name) && + strcmp(key_field->var.name, key_field_test->var.name) != 0) + return false; } for (i = 0; i < hist_data->n_sort_keys; i++) { -- 1.9.3