From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7C2C4321E for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 18:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233966AbiK1SBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:01:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41690 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232976AbiK1SAj (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 13:00:39 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AD3227DFE; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id b4so11207409pfb.9; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:47:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mZKuvJhFRP5fDD1GxgFohQBtxaDdSsjAdzx3M27SwEE=; b=yN4RJ/hOAMDCk0uORpcJusF+Sht+RaDxcesaQHwI1yVVMqupcYHCmOr7x5Du6s75p2 Nq4NSEYUMbcduw8AlF/2RXpP+J14qgbVqwe+6pisY9M0yc3+a5dkr8MXIoy3mjoBXMVH 6LupHLW8BdPrCzlpcve7fpFpM0hjMsIoQL+BSe3EXnTZTG/FEnHoZ+3W7YT7Gy8iFPvu zyRZzt1YXu5ojYED7qGsqsDlBIgsMexHClZJduZmDWz1Ad5WG65HQ7QwdUp94pS4ttuX BxgOLnT1MpwI4y8yiAVtrsXeH8UO+NBy+SR+13HLGYuPIcV11ALmcpIhGfkPVdRKby/l ZLGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5plilEvB8qS7yQzVvAP+XTHDOGwCU13BgkgtBuViFIWSEHqycAT9 H6/G5R2Mlazl6r4K+meppPA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf5b56D5U7xlFZNXY9EV8a41oSDS7cAF4ID7GMgiHEd0+TF/j14hxb2MwuUJBqsLZOBxMzTEmQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1466:0:b0:476:cac7:16ad with SMTP id 38-20020a631466000000b00476cac716admr29993503pgu.128.1669657665374; Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:47:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2620:15c:211:201:95f2:baa2:773c:2cfe? ([2620:15c:211:201:95f2:baa2:773c:2cfe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x189-20020a6231c6000000b0056cee8af3a6sm8304685pfx.54.2022.11.28.09.47.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:47:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2022 09:47:41 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/16] ufs: mcq: Add completion support of a cqe Content-Language: en-US To: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Asutosh Das Cc: quic_cang@quicinc.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com, quic_xiaosenh@quicinc.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com, eddie.huang@mediatek.com, daejun7.park@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, beanhuo@micron.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Jinyoung Choi , Arthur Simchaev , Kiwoong Kim , open list References: <32219cb9b058d7329ad8234a8a287701af1a0e34.1669176158.git.quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com> <20221128170015.GM62721@thinkpad> From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <20221128170015.GM62721@thinkpad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/22 09:00, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:10:27PM -0800, Asutosh Das wrote: >> Add support for completing requests from Completion Queue. >> Some host controllers support vendor specific registers >> that provide a bitmap of all CQ's which have at least one >> completed CQE. Add this support. >> The MCQ specification doesn't provide the Task Tag or its >> equivalent in the Completion Queue Entry. >> So use an indirect method to find the Task Tag from the >> Completion Queue Entry. >> >> Co-developed-by: Can Guo >> Signed-off-by: Can Guo >> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das >> Reported-by: kernel test robot > > What is this reported by for? I think that tag should be left out. "Reported-by: kernel test robot" should only be used for patches that fix bugs reported by the kernel test robot. I assume that a fix has been folded in into this patch that was reported by the kernel test robot. If that is the case, the "Reported-by: kernel test robot" tag is inappropriate. Bart.