From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694651FC0 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2a02:8108:963f:de38:6624:6d8d:f790:d5c]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1nhZKp-0004EH-PB; Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:07:11 +0200 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:07:10 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: regressions@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized Content-Language: en-US To: Linus Walleij , Mario Limonciello Cc: firew4lker , Bartosz Golaszewski , Andy Shevchenko , Shreeya Patel , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , open list , Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com, Richard.Gong@amd.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , "regressions@lists.linux.dev" References: <20220414025705.598-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com> <20966c6b-9045-9f8b-ba35-bf44091ce380@gmail.com> <67df4178-5943-69d8-0d61-f533671a1248@amd.com> From: Thorsten Leemhuis In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1650557235;aceedccc; X-HE-SMSGID: 1nhZKp-0004EH-PB On 20.04.22 00:02, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 6:34 AM Mario Limonciello > wrote: > >> Linus Walleij, >> >> As this is backported to 5.15.y, 5.16.y, 5.17.y and those all had point >> releases a bunch of people are hitting it now. If you choose to adopt >> this patch instead of revert the broken one, you can add to the commit >> message too: >> >> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1976 > > I am on parental leave kind of, but Bartosz knows what to do, > in this case, since it is ACPI-related, Andy knows best what > to do, and I see he also replied. Bartosz, Andy, what's the status here? It looks like the patch didn't make any progress in the past few days (or did I miss it?). I'd really like to see this patch or a revert of 5467801f1fcb ("gpio: Restrict usage of GPIO chip irq members before initialization") mainlined by rc4, so Greg (CCed) can fix it in the next round of stable updates, as it seems quite a few people are affected by the problem. Reminder: this is one of those issue that we IMHO really should fix quickly, as explained by a text recently added to the documentation: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst#n131 Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.