All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>, io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] submission path cleanups and optimisation
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:25:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de91ee40-af76-3213-f2ee-e385164271d3@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1613671791.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On 2/18/21 11:29 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Refactor how we do io_req_prep(), which is currently spilled across
> multiple ifs and functions, that's a mess which is hard to validate.
> It also cuts down amount of work we're doing during submission, where
> nops(batch=32) test shows 15217 vs 16830 KIOPS, before and after
> respectively.
> 
> 1-6 are easy and should change nothing functionally.
> 
> 7/11 cancels all the link, where currently it can be partially executed.
> That happens only in some cases, and currently is not consistent. That
> change alters the user visible behaviour and breaks one liburing test,
> but looks like the right thing to do. (IMHO, the test is buggy in that
> regard).
> 
> 8/11 makes us to do one more opcode switch for where we previously
> were doing io_req_defer_prep(). That includes all links, but the total
> performance win, removing an extra async setup in 10/11, and just making
> all the thing cleaner justifies it well enough.

Looks good and tests good, I'm going to queue this up for 5.12 as it'll
be easier for later fixes too.

-- 
Jens Axboe


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-18 18:29 [PATCH 00/11] submission path cleanups and optimisation Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 01/11] io_uring: kill fictitious submit iteration index Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 02/11] io_uring: keep io_*_prep() naming consistent Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 03/11] io_uring: don't duplicate ->file check in sfr Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 04/11] io_uring: move io_init_req()'s definition Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 05/11] io_uring: move io_init_req() into io_submit_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 06/11] io_uring: move req link into submit_state Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 07/11] io_uring: don't submit link on error Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 08/11] io_uring: split sqe-prep and async setup Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 09/11] io_uring: do io_*_prep() early in io_submit_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 10/11] io_uring: don't do async setup for links' heads Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 18:29 ` [PATCH 11/11] io_uring: fail links more in io_submit_sqe() Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-18 20:25 ` Jens Axboe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de91ee40-af76-3213-f2ee-e385164271d3@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.