All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Davies <btrfs-list@steev.me.uk>
To: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>,
	John Petrini <john.d.petrini@gmail.com>
Cc: John Petrini <me@johnpetrini.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem Went Read Only During Raid-10 to Raid-6 Data Conversion
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 11:36:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de9a3d52-0147-255c-4c39-09bf734e1435@steev.me.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200717055706.GJ10769@hungrycats.org>

On 17/07/2020 06:57, Zygo Blaxell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 09:11:17PM -0400, John Petrini wrote:

--snip--

>> /dev/sdf, ID: 12
>>     Device size:             9.10TiB
>>     Device slack:              0.00B
>>     Data,RAID10:           784.31GiB
>>     Data,RAID10:             4.01TiB
>>     Data,RAID10:             3.34TiB
>>     Data,RAID6:            458.56GiB
>>     Data,RAID6:            144.07GiB
>>     Data,RAID6:            293.03GiB
>>     Metadata,RAID10:         4.47GiB
>>     Metadata,RAID10:       352.00MiB
>>     Metadata,RAID10:         6.00GiB
>>     Metadata,RAID1C3:        5.00GiB
>>     System,RAID1C3:         32.00MiB
>>     Unallocated:            85.79GiB
> 
> OK...slack is 0, so there wasn't anything weird with underlying device
> sizes going on.
> 
> There's 3 entries for "Data,RAID6" because there are three stripe widths:
> 12 disks, 6 disks, and 4 disks, corresponding to the number of disks of
> each size.  Unfortunately 'dev usage' doesn't say which one is which.

RFE: improve 'dev usage' to show these details.

As a user I'd look at this output and assume a bug in btrfs-tools 
because of the repeated conflicting information.

-- 
Steven Davies

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-18 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14 16:13 Filesystem Went Read Only During Raid-10 to Raid-6 Data Conversion John Petrini
2020-07-15  1:18 ` Zygo Blaxell
     [not found]   ` <CADvYWxcq+-Fg0W9dmc-shwszF-7sX+GDVig0GncpvwKUDPfT7g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20200716042739.GB8346@hungrycats.org>
2020-07-16 13:37       ` John Petrini
     [not found]         ` <CAJix6J9kmQjfFJJ1GwWXsX7WW6QKxPqpKx86g7hgA4PfbH5Rpg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-16 22:57           ` Zygo Blaxell
2020-07-17  1:11             ` John Petrini
2020-07-17  5:57               ` Zygo Blaxell
2020-07-17 22:54                 ` John Petrini
2020-07-18 10:36                 ` Steven Davies [this message]
2020-07-20 17:57                   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2020-07-21 10:15                     ` Steven Davies
2020-07-21 20:48                       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2020-07-23  8:57                         ` Steven Davies
2020-07-23 19:29                           ` Zygo Blaxell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de9a3d52-0147-255c-4c39-09bf734e1435@steev.me.uk \
    --to=btrfs-list@steev.me.uk \
    --cc=ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org \
    --cc=john.d.petrini@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@johnpetrini.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.