All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, clm@fb.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 17:54:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df334467-9c1a-2f03-654f-58b002ea5ae4@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191212223403.GH19213@dread.disaster.area>

On 12/12/19 3:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:29:43AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> This adds support for RWF_UNCACHED for file systems using iomap to
>> perform buffered writes. We use the generic infrastructure for this,
>> by tracking pages we created and calling write_drop_cached_pages()
>> to issue writeback and prune those pages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>> ---
>>  fs/iomap/apply.c       | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  include/linux/iomap.h  |  5 +++++
>>  3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/apply.c b/fs/iomap/apply.c
>> index 562536da8a13..966826ad4bb9 100644
>> --- a/fs/iomap/apply.c
>> +++ b/fs/iomap/apply.c
>> @@ -90,5 +90,29 @@ iomap_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, unsigned flags,
>>  				     flags, &iomap);
>>  	}
>>  
>> +	if (written && (flags & IOMAP_UNCACHED)) {
>> +		struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
>> +
>> +		end = pos + written;
>> +		ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, pos, end);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto out;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * No pages were created for this range, we're done
>> +		 */
>> +		if (!(iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_PAGE_CREATE))
>> +			goto out;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Try to invalidate cache pages for the range we just wrote.
>> +		 * We don't care if invalidation fails as the write has still
>> +		 * worked and leaving clean uptodate pages in the page cache
>> +		 * isn't a corruption vector for uncached IO.
>> +		 */
>> +		invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
>> +				pos >> PAGE_SHIFT, end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +	}
>> +out:
>>  	return written ? written : ret;
>>  }
> 
> Just a thought on further optimisation for this for XFS.
> IOMAP_UNCACHED is being passed into the filesystem ->iomap_begin
> methods by iomap_apply().  Hence the filesystems know that it is
> an uncached IO that is being done, and we can tailor allocation
> strategies to suit the fact that the data is going to be written
> immediately.
> 
> In this case, XFS needs to treat it the same way it treats direct
> IO. That is, we do immediate unwritten extent allocation rather than
> delayed allocation. This will reduce the allocation overhead and
> will optimise for immediate IO locality rather than optimise for
> delayed allocation.
> 
> This should just be a relatively simple change to
> xfs_file_iomap_begin() along the lines of:
> 
> -	if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) && !(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) &&
> -			!IS_DAX(inode) && !xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> +	if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) &&
> +	    !(flags & (IOMAP_DIRECT | IOMAP_UNCACHED)) &&
> +	    !IS_DAX(inode) && !xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> 		/* Reserve delalloc blocks for regular writeback. */
> 		return xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay(inode, offset, length, flags,
> 				iomap);
> 	}
> 
> so that it avoids delayed allocation for uncached IO...

That's very handy! Thanks, I'll add that to the next version. Just out
of curiosity, would you prefer this as a separate patch, or just bundle
it with the iomap buffered RWF_UNCACHED patch? I'm assuming the latter,
and I'll just mention it in the changelog.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-13  0:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-11 15:29 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: add read support " Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: make generic_perform_write() take a struct kiocb Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: make buffered writes work with RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] iomap: pass in the write_begin/write_end flags to iomap_actor Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 17:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:19   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-11 18:05     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:34   ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-13  0:54     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2019-12-13  0:57       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-16  4:17         ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-17 14:31           ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-18  0:49             ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-18  1:01               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:37 ` [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 17:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 17:56   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 19:14     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 19:14       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 19:34     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 20:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 20:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 20:08         ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 20:18           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 20:18             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 21:04             ` Johannes Weiner
2019-12-12  1:30               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 23:41             ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:08                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:11                 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:22                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:22                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:29                     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:41                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:41                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:56                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12  2:47                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  2:47                             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 17:52                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12 18:29                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 18:29                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 20:05                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12  1:41                       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  1:49                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:49                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12  1:09               ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  2:03                 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  2:10                   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12  2:21                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12  2:38                     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:18                 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-13  1:32                   ` Chris Mason
2020-01-07 17:42                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-08 14:09                       ` Chris Mason
2020-02-01 10:33                     ` Andres Freund
2019-12-11 20:43           ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-11 20:04       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 10:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
2019-12-12 15:16   ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 21:45     ` Martin Steigerwald
2019-12-12 22:15       ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:18     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 22:18       ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-12 19:01 [PATCHSET v4 " Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-13  2:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-13  2:38     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 20:42 [PATCHSET v2 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-11  1:14   ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-11 14:44     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 16:24 [PATCHSET 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df334467-9c1a-2f03-654f-58b002ea5ae4@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.