From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bw2bf-0008To-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:45:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bw2bc-0006kr-1F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2016 03:45:11 -0400 References: <1476335734-29831-1-git-send-email-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> <20161013222835.GP18039@umbus.fritz.box> <20161014102759.566a1c5e@bahia> From: Thomas Huth Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 09:44:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PULL 0/4] ppc patches for qemu-2.7 stable branch List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Greg Kurz Cc: qemu-stable , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , QEMU Developers , David Gibson On 14.10.2016 19:38, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 14 October 2016 at 09:27, Greg Kurz wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 09:28:35 +1100 >> David Gibson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:57:19PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> On 13 October 2016 at 12:54, Peter Maydell wrote: >>>> More generally, we need to come up with something for distinguishing >>>> PULL requests not for master, because my current workflow basically >>>> says "anything that says 'for you to fetch changes up to' will get >>>> merged into master... >>> >>> Um.. yes.. this was intended for merge to the 2.7 branch, not master. >>> Any ideas how I should express that? >>> >> >> I'm not aware of any formal process, other than sending a mail to >> qemu-stable and Cc: Michael Roth. This is often done by simply >> replying to selected messages in the pull requests for the master >> branch. >> >> Then Michael does all the cherry picking stuff and usually sends a >> patch round-up two weeks before the stable release, for people to >> review. >=20 > Yes, I think I was partly thrown because in general patches > don't go into the stable branches via pull requests. > That said, my current filter/workflow is clearly broken > so I'm open to any suggestions for easy-for-me-to-filter-for > ways to flag up that a pull request isn't aimed at master. Maybe simply filter out the requests that include qemu-stable in "To:" ? Thomas