It was <2020-06-01 pon 16:10>, when Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 04:56:40PM +0200, Lukasz Stelmach wrote: >> It was <2020-06-01 pon 15:46>, when Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 04:27:50PM +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> >> Move the definition of malloc pool size of the decompressor to >> >> a single place. This value will be exposed later for kexec_file loader. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach >> >> --- >> >> arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile | 2 ++ >> >> arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S | 6 ++++-- >> >> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile >> >> index 9c11e7490292..b3594cd1588c 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/Makefile >> >> @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ KBSS_SZ = $(shell echo $$(($$($(NM) $(obj)/../../../../vmlinux | \ >> >> sed -n -e 's/^\([^ ]*\) [AB] __bss_start$$/-0x\1/p' \ >> >> -e 's/^\([^ ]*\) [AB] __bss_stop$$/+0x\1/p') )) ) >> >> LDFLAGS_vmlinux = --defsym _kernel_bss_size=$(KBSS_SZ) >> >> +# malloc pool size >> >> +LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --defsym _malloc_size=0x10000 >> >> # Supply ZRELADDR to the decompressor via a linker symbol. >> >> ifneq ($(CONFIG_AUTO_ZRELADDR),y) >> >> LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --defsym zreladdr=$(ZRELADDR) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S >> >> index e8e1c866e413..dcc1afa60fb9 100644 >> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S >> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S >> >> @@ -309,7 +309,8 @@ restart: adr r0, LC0 >> >> #ifndef CONFIG_ZBOOT_ROM >> >> /* malloc space is above the relocated stack (64k max) */ >> >> add sp, sp, r0 >> >> - add r10, sp, #0x10000 >> >> + ldr r10, =_malloc_size >> >> + add r10, r10, sp >> > >> > This says "locate _malloc_size in a literal pool somewhere, and load it >> > using a PC-relative offset". Are you sure that the literal pool is >> > sensibly located? >> > >> > Would it be better to use a definition for this? >> >> I've followed ZRELADDR way. I think both values should be handled the >> same way (it makes it easier to comprehend IMHO). Is there any reason >> not to? Should I change ZRELADDR for v2 too? > > There's a good reason. ZRELADDR can be a constant that does not fit > into the ARMs immediate constants (8 bits of significant data plus > a multiple of a 2-bit shift), whereas the size of the malloc space > is guaranteed to fit. So, ZRELADDR has to use a literal load. > This doesn't. Indeed this is how TEXT_OFFSET works. Done. -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics