All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
	Jon Grimm <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: AMD SEV-SNP/Intel TDX: validation of memory pages
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:48:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e07e5abd-72c3-17fb-6c65-19bdfc76382e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCawl4a6f8dLlciq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 2/12/21 8:45 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But you're right, if a HV injects #VE in the syscall gap and gets a
> concurrent CPU to 'fix' the exception frame (which then lives on the
> user stack) the handler might never know it went ga-ga.
> 
> Is this something the TDX thread model covers? A malicous HV and a TDX
> guest co-operating to bring down the guest kernel.

I'll say this: The current TDX guest code that Sathya posted is
predicated on an assumption that an malicious HV can not inject a #VE in
the syscall gap, or any of the other sensitive paths.

A #VE in the syscall gap is just as fatal as a #PF or #GP would be
there.  If TDX can't provide guarantees to the guest that a #VE won't
happen there, then TDX is broken, or the kernel implementation is broken.

If anyone knows of any way for a HV to inject #VE in the syscall gap,
please speak up.  Better to know now.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-12 17:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  1:51 AMD SEV-SNP/Intel TDX: validation of memory pages David Rientjes
2021-02-02 13:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2021-02-02 16:02 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2021-02-03  0:16   ` Brijesh Singh
2021-02-11 17:46     ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-02 22:37 ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-11 20:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 13:19 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 14:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 14:53     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 15:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 15:28         ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 16:12           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 16:18             ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-12 16:45               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 17:48                 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2021-02-12 18:22                   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-12 18:38                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-12 18:43                       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-12 18:46                     ` Dave Hansen
2021-02-12 19:24                       ` Sean Christopherson
2021-02-16 10:00                 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-16 14:27                   ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-16 14:46                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 15:59                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 16:25                         ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-16 16:48                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 18:26                             ` Joerg Roedel
2021-02-16 18:33                               ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 16:47                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-16 16:57                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-16 17:05                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-16 16:55                       ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-12 21:42             ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-12 21:58               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 22:39                 ` Andi Kleen
2021-02-12 22:46                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-02-13  9:38                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-12 23:51                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-23  9:33 ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e07e5abd-72c3-17fb-6c65-19bdfc76382e@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.