From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kever Yang Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 21:11:11 +0800 Subject: [U-Boot] =?utf-8?q?=5BPATCH_2/3=5D_rockchip=3A_use_=27arch-rockch?= =?utf-8?b?aXAnIGFzIGhlYWRlciBmaWxlIHBhdGjjgJDor7fms6jmhI/vvIzpgq7ku7Y=?= =?utf-8?b?55Sxc2pnQGdvb2dsZS5jb23ku6Plj5HjgJE=?= In-Reply-To: References: <20190328030124.29826-1-kever.yang@rock-chips.com> <20190328030124.29826-3-kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Hi Simon, On 04/04/2019 03:57 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Kever, > > On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 15:18, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Kever, >> >> On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 at 21:01, Kever Yang wrote: >>> Rockchip use 'arch-rockchip' instead of arch-$(SOC) as common >>> header file path, so that we can get the correct path directly. >> Can you give a few more details on the reason for this change? I >> cannot see the benefit? > OK I figured it out from the context. > > Do you have interest in supporting multiple SoCs with a single build? Is there other vendor support multiple SoCs? For Rockchip platform, I don't think it's easy to do it now, the different for different SoCs now: - SoC init, eg. debug uart init, sgrf setting and other one time init setting; - clock driver; - pinctrl driver, David still working on it, but the target is for minimum size for   each SoC, but not enable common code in pinctrl-core as much as possible,   so this is the opposite way with support multiple SoCs support. I would like to use common board/spl/tpl files first, and then step to step to see what we need to do. Thanks, - Kever > Regards, > Simon >