From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60048 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751167AbeDDOae (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2018 10:30:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Patches for stable To: Greg KH Cc: stable , Boris Ostrovsky , xen-devel References: <20180404142702.GA20460@kroah.com> From: Juergen Gross Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:30:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180404142702.GA20460@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/04/18 16:27, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:38:43PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Please add the patches: >> >> commit 038bac2b02989acf1fc938cedcb7944c02672b9f upstream >> commit dfc9327ab7c99bc13e12106448615efba833886b upstream >> commit b17d9d1df3c33a4f1d2bf397e2257aecf9dc56d4 upstream >> >> to the 4.15 and 4.16 stable kernels. >> >> Those patches are needed to boot Linux as PVH guest on recent Xen. > > So a new feature? Why is that ok for stable kernels? It works for kernels since at least 4.11 on Xen 4.10. > >> In PVH mode there is no guarantee the kernel can find the RSDP table >> at the legacy location in low memory, which is a requirement for the >> kernel to boot successful without those patches. > > Why not just use newer kernels for new Xen features? This really > doesn't look like a bugfix to me, does it to you? It does. A working setup will no longer work if Xen version is upgraded to 4.11. Juergen