From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com (mail-wm1-f68.google.com [209.85.128.68]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B507FEB7 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id 20so2930369wmj.4 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:55:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=icGp14sr54nGrHIK9Q2mUBD+uxEEniHeUCgVpCsIAuE=; b=DFh0XiCFsETrrDRfv98th8uKUtIx7LVD6EFhAMmW45QA9BGkx4ewC3PH03HVefWm2N /YuAhoPRWtDZUDtvvDFrhXHZhs1f66O9LauU9dMBWC5DstdPI+naqevpohND91s5w86X 7fFMfw0NUc7fHNJRXvgtCB10siPiaqRgqZ3Lw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=icGp14sr54nGrHIK9Q2mUBD+uxEEniHeUCgVpCsIAuE=; b=asLIPHK8smXhakqKa9IKQR/iHzBl7oKF4y5OqYeRj2sM4J+ajqw5NfeswxxGndmJME oF3ObbpO4SK3mCqmPAaxPsiN/b+lL0DQCZTrAUEnueJuRMlMcFmDntSXW+kKnMJ6pED+ fM4OQfYgrzeQ4a0p/trEfpFIGy8ByfoeFCnJJSBarHl1EX+VXk4OTsno2WTjzaaNScfX yyWXvWqdJLLtTFexi9y0BYSStEyqjH0I02tHbXB081z+q6Ui2OO+lbeXpZvoBgPpbf9q o3zaMclDn0ujPzapHl3N48dOGSmMasq/Cmu0H9v+Zw9vhoGxxubZEvoFIprUEWMDO8eo wrZA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9uYgvDoP678Ffbis6ZWQjzY3vyHHYSCurFegdonRHGK4QmZtl Qc2IAbD+zy7GcIcZoM5PMK9XgA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw1/Y8DknYTqBhKZuwHsPAGToSzjNd3atun7VuA+j7S8RUCZ5fhGC8ztjk8fsXqv1aOyysSug== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c190:: with SMTP id y16mr5160449wmi.107.1578578154178; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from hex (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com. [87.81.244.161]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g25sm3948611wmh.3.2020.01.09.05.55.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 05:55:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Richard Purdie To: Alexander Kanavin Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:55:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20200108132759.95603-1-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <20200108132759.95603-11-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <15ea8a58c140419c32f08e4ab6148677bb23e920.camel@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Tom Rini , OE-core Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/28] ifupdown: update 0.8.22 -> 0.8.35 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:55:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2020-01-09 at 14:54 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 14:47, Alexander Kanavin < > alex.kanavin@gmail.com> wrote: > > I had a closer look at how and where ifupdown recipe is used, and > > from what I see it isn't: > > every configuration is relying on busybox to provide the same > > utilities. That's why the failure is seen only in world builds :) > > > > Should we drop the ifupdown recipe? > > > > A followup: there is a busybox-free set put together in meta/recipes- > extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-base-utils.bb > which includes ifupdown only if systemd is not in use. > > However that packagegroup is not used in any images, and the only > test for it is in lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/imagefeatures.py > which does enable systemd, so that doesn't pull in ifupdown either. > > This means ifupdown isn't runtime-tested now, and probably hasn't > been tested for a while. That may be but I think this is an oversight, not an intention and we should support busybox-free images... Cheers, Richard