Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for CLSA0100 and CSC3551 ACPI nodes

[Lucas tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>]

On 12/20/21 17:24, Stefan Binding wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Sent: 17 December 2021 18:27
>> To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>; Lucas Tanure
>> <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>; Stefan Binding
>> <sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com>
>> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>; Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>;
>> Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>; Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>;
>> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>; Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>;
>> moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...
>> <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>; ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-
>> acpi@vger.kernel.org>; patches@opensource.cirrus.com; Platform Driver
>> <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] ACPI / scan: Create platform device for
>> CLSA0100 and CSC3551 ACPI nodes
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 12/17/21 18:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:57 PM Lucas Tanure
>>> <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The ACPI device with CLSA0100 or CSC3551 is a sound card
>>>> with multiple instances of CS35L41 connectec by I2C to
>>>
>>> "connected" I suppose?
>>>
>>>> the main CPU.
>>>>
>>>> We add an ID to the i2c_multi_instantiate_ids list to enumerate
>>>> all I2C slaves correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <tanureal@opensource.cirrus.com>
>>>
>>> This requires an ACK from Hans.
>>>
>>> If you receive one, please feel free to add my ACK to it too.
>>
>> One problem which I see here is that this change conflicts with
>> this series:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211210154050.3713-1-
>> sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/
>>
>> I have reviewing that series on my todo list.
>>
>> One interesting question for you (Rafael) about that series is
>> that i2c-multi-instantiate.c, which after the series also handles
>> spi devices,is being moved to drivers/acpi .
>>
>> This is fine with me, but I wonder if it would not be better
>> to keep it under drivers/platform/x86 ? Since the new SPI
>> use-cases are also all on x86 laptops AFAICT.
>>
>> But back to this series, as said the 2 series conflict, since
>> both are being submitted by @opensource.cirrus.com people,
>> it would be good if the Cirrus folks can decide in which
>> order these series should be merged.
>>
>> It might be best to just move this one patch to the other series?
>> Thus removing the conflict between the 2 series.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
> 
> We don’t really have a preference which order these two chains
> should be merged in. We would rebase the other chain if one
> got merged first.
> If pushed for an answer, maybe:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211210154050.3713-1-sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com/
> should be merged first?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> 
>>
>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/acpi/scan.c                          |  3 +++
>>>>   drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>>> index b7a6b982226e..8740cfa11f59 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
>>>> @@ -1712,8 +1712,11 @@ static bool
>> acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent(struct acpi_device *device)
>>>>          static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_instantiate_ids[] = {
>>>>                  {"BSG1160", },
>>>>                  {"BSG2150", },
>>>> +               {"CSC3551", },
>>>>                  {"INT33FE", },
>>>>                  {"INT3515", },
>>>> +               /* Non-conforming _HID for Cirrus Logic already released */
>>>> +               {"CLSA0100", },
>>>>                  {}
>>>>          };
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>> b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>>> index 4956a1df5b90..a889789b966c 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/i2c-multi-instantiate.c
>>>> @@ -147,6 +147,14 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  =
>> {
>>>>          {}
>>>>   };
>>>>
>>>> +static const struct i2c_inst_data cs35l41_hda[] = {
>>>> +       { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>>> +       { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>>> +       { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>>> +       { "cs35l41-hda", IRQ_RESOURCE_GPIO, 0 },
>>>> +       {}
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>>   /*
>>>>    * Note new device-ids must also be added to i2c_multi_instantiate_ids in
>>>>    * drivers/acpi/scan.c: acpi_device_enumeration_by_parent().
>>>> @@ -154,7 +162,10 @@ static const struct i2c_inst_data int3515_data[]  =
>> {
>>>>   static const struct acpi_device_id i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids[] = {
>>>>          { "BSG1160", (unsigned long)bsg1160_data },
>>>>          { "BSG2150", (unsigned long)bsg2150_data },
>>>> +       { "CSC3551", (unsigned long)cs35l41_hda },
>>>>          { "INT3515", (unsigned long)int3515_data },
>>>> +       /* Non-conforming _HID for Cirrus Logic already released */
>>>> +       { "CLSA0100", (unsigned long)cs35l41_hda },
>>>>          { }
>>>>   };
>>>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, i2c_multi_inst_acpi_ids);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.34.1
>>>>
>>>
> 
> 
As the ic2-multi-instantiate patch chain is still being worked out, we 
would like to submit a new chain for CLSA0100 id and a few fixes for the 
HDA cs35l41 driver.
And to avoid conflicts the ic2-multi-instantiate patch chain will wait 
for this new patch chain to be merged.

Thanks,
Lucas Tanure