From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Turmel Subject: Re: Fault tolerance with badblocks Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 17:23:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <03294ec0-2df0-8c1c-dd98-2e9e5efb6f4f@hale.ee> <590B3039.3060000@youngman.org.uk> <84184eb3-52c4-e7ad-cd5b-5021b5cf47ee@hale.ee> <590DC905.60207@youngman.org.uk> <87h90v8kt3.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <1533bba8-41cb-2c50-b28a-52786e463072@turmel.org> <87vapb6s9h.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <87inla73vz.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <5911A371.3030008@hesbynett.no> <878tm65kyx.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <1f354d53-9eeb-7e00-d2c0-f2fa571cf8c8@turmel.org> <87mval4x6k.fsf@esperi.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87mval4x6k.fsf@esperi.org.uk> Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Nix Cc: David Brown , Anthony Youngman , "Ravi (Tom) Hale" , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids On 05/09/2017 04:01 PM, Nix wrote: > On 9 May 2017, Phil Turmel told this: >> The bottom line is that any kernel that implements the auto-correct you >> seem to think is a slam dunk will be shunned by any system administrator >> who actually cares about their data. Your obtuseness notwithstanding. > > Gee, thanks heaps. Next time I want randomly insulting by someone who > doesn't bother to tell me his actual *arguments* in any message before > the one that starts on the insults, I'll come straight to you. Ok, yeah, I was a bit harsh. Ad hominem is not appropriate. Not that the shunning wouldn't happen. As for the arguments, well, *everyone* on this list is providing arguments and you are ignoring them. Whether you are filtering facts on pre-conceived ideas about raid6 or simply can't understand the points, the result *appears* obtuse. And now, please all drop me from the CC. Phil