From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEE8C31E5B for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EA020873 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730520AbfFRVwA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:52:00 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:51590 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729982AbfFRVwA (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:52:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x5ILpmff022036; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 16:51:49 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] driver core: Fix use-after-free and double free on glue directory From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Greg KH , Muchun Song Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Prateek Sood , Mukesh Ojha , gkohli@codeaurora.org, linux-kernel , linux-arm-msm , zhaowuyun@wingtech.com Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 07:51:46 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20190618161340.GA13983@kroah.com> References: <20190516142342.28019-1-smuchun@gmail.com> <20190524190443.GB29565@kroah.com> <20190618152859.GB1912@kroah.com> <20190618161340.GA13983@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 18:13 +0200, Greg KH wrote: > > Again, I am totally confused and do not see a patch in an email that > I > can apply... > > Someone needs to get people to agree here... I think he was hoping you would chose which solution you prefered here :-) His original or the one I suggested instead. I don't think there's anybody else with understanding of sysfs guts around to form an opinion. Cheers, Ben.