From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Anoob Joseph <Anoob.Joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] lib/security: add ESN soft limit in
	conf
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 19:57:42 +0530
Message-ID: <e469bc76-8491-59e2-46d3-e41df6bb4f20@caviumnetworks.com>
References: <1519896103-32479-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1521630685-5179-1-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
 <1521630685-5179-3-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Narayana Prasad <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>,
 Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
 Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
To: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
 Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
 Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-co1nam03on0082.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.82])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485CC1B735
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Apr 2018 16:28:02 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1521630685-5179-3-git-send-email-anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Adding maintainers of testpmd & lib/ethdev

Thanks,
Anoob
On 21/03/18 16:41, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> Adding ESN soft limit in conf. This will be used in case of protocol
> offload. Per SA, application could specify for what ESN the security
> device need to notify application. In case of eth dev(inline protocol),
> rte_eth_event framework would raise an IPsec event.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
> v3:
> * Minor change in the comment
>
> v2:
> * No change
>
>   lib/librte_security/rte_security.h | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> index c75c121..ca1e912 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_security/rte_security.h
> @@ -222,6 +222,8 @@ struct rte_security_ipsec_xform {
>   	/**< IPsec SA Mode - transport/tunnel */
>   	struct rte_security_ipsec_tunnel_param tunnel;
>   	/**< Tunnel parameters, NULL for transport mode */
> +	uint64_t esn_soft_limit;
> +	/**< ESN for which the overflow event need to be raised */
>   };
>   
>   /**