From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7367AC433EF for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BEF6103A for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235440AbhKGN6O (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:58:14 -0500 Received: from smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net ([212.54.57.96]:56902 "EHLO smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229679AbhKGN6K (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:58:10 -0500 Received: from [212.54.57.110] (helo=csmtp6.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mjidp-0002WK-4y for linux-input@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 14:55:25 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([94.175.123.86]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id jidomciup24zojidpmuFr5; Sun, 07 Nov 2021 14:55:25 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [94.175.123.86] X-Authenticated-Sender: gareth.randall@virgin.net X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.4 cv=K8YxogaI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6187dacd cx=a_exe a=mwdPpgLduwvwBeoi1XfOCA==:117 a=mwdPpgLduwvwBeoi1XfOCA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=vIxV3rELxO4A:10 a=f6pUZMUfAAAA:8 a=qsNWos9tGE8nN0yM_qkA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=eZImKStj3dtCS-zw9-0K:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgin.net; s=meg.feb2017; t=1636293325; bh=At6jo9YpfsdHSsdeZ2+dydcmt8Eyh5MnpCGfulD85qY=; h=Date:From:Subject:To:References:In-Reply-To; b=UD83caO7NpPxhpULwqB+ltqBuIGNHiiOyTTdx09sxVlYMNZfSVRv093hQa4TXFanQ ggUw8pgas4Bf0BKKY8LQwcudeuCTjPCdXCz+dKfJYLxvI9kPrgXw9hc4g2xGkuoG/6 ZUwMnpx6o0G+A3cQIF/evA7wDLPxAoMlh0TTVQezBnCrslz922bsKpITKp86eUVqVl GP4BkyfE8eRBg1iLNCoD1cJd93YC/xRGyCw3ZJCegOVp6Q2HiWigIwlBB4AdtqHGzE phiTWPWw+t8YsKD6szv/u1ekrVrBo2pyBopPa3ws8C/PSqLtPVvVYda9oDc1c6DKXr mDTd5Z3rnT/iQ== Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:55:24 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 From: Gareth Randall Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/1] Add support for touch screens using the General Touch ST6001S controller. To: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org References: <3083b553-38f1-7061-a8cb-8bbd423913a3@virgin.net> In-Reply-To: <3083b553-38f1-7061-a8cb-8bbd423913a3@virgin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfHnDXYNXWiZnefs4rluqFPFiWD/14CA30aALXh1jsFGjdAMtsHw5QE2pPFntdJnHIJZjAiDaQTvHnAhvgNCRdbYDwvR970SkHQXavP9LBZ0mAjYRbQls culxmhTPHmrGvGFyMVAEhQsfDLmS+c72C6GE1pu5MKeht8Nob8JpQ+Ih9T2asVJHVB3hJveOdkl5slqdJNbKPIf9Ce5oIPJizx5Z2w7OcxHsQ02A4rq4NKPD ieHuCMPPLucZ2mOkQLFhvg== Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Dear Dmitry, I wonder if you have had a chance to look at this patch. It was originally sent on 26 Sep 2021, then resent on 3 Oct 2021 to try to make it come out in Patchwork properly. This is my first patch submission so any feedback on both the patch and whether I'm following the process properly would be very useful. Thanks very much. Yours, Gareth On 15/10/2021 10:04, Gareth Randall wrote: > On 03/10/2021 22:54, Gareth Randall wrote: >> Add support for touch screens using the General Touch ST6001S >> controller, as found in the GPEG model AOD22WZ-ST monitor. >> This controller can output the ELO 10-byte protocol, >> but requires different initialisation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gareth Randall >> --- >>   drivers/input/touchscreen/elo.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>   1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) > > Hi, > > I'm seeking feedback on this patch. I just wondered whether I have made > any mistakes in the submission, or whether the maintainers are just very > busy (most likely explanation!) > > I know that this does not appear properly in patchwork even though I > have attempted to recreate the exact format of a [PATCH] email, but I > don't want to send duplicate attempts. I've checked that there are no > wrapped lines in the email message. Is there a test suite that is > failing that I'm not aware of, or conventions I'm not following? > > Thanks for any feedback. > > Yours, > > Gareth