From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752775AbcFTXqn (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:46:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:58738 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752485AbcFTXpR (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:45:17 -0400 From: Andy Lutomirski To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Nadav Amit , Kees Cook , Brian Gerst , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , Linus Torvalds , Josh Poimboeuf , Jann Horn , Heiko Carstens , Andy Lutomirski Subject: [PATCH v3 11/13] x86/dumpstack/64: Handle faults when printing the "Stack:" part of an OOPS Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:43:41 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.5 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If we overflow the stack into a guard page, we'll recursively fault when trying to dump the contents of the guard page. Use probe_kernel_address so we can recover if this happens. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski --- arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c index 603356a5597a..5e298638c790 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, stack = sp; for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) { + unsigned long word; + if (stack >= irq_stack && stack <= irq_stack_end) { if (stack == irq_stack_end) { stack = (unsigned long *) (irq_stack_end[-1]); @@ -285,12 +287,18 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, if (kstack_end(stack)) break; } + + if (probe_kernel_address(stack, word)) + break; + if ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0) { if (i != 0) pr_cont("\n"); - printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, *stack++); + printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, word); } else - pr_cont(" %016lx", *stack++); + pr_cont(" %016lx", word); + + stack++; touch_nmi_watchdog(); } preempt_enable(); -- 2.5.5 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Lutomirski Subject: [PATCH v3 11/13] x86/dumpstack/64: Handle faults when printing the "Stack:" part of an OOPS Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:43:41 -0700 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Return-path: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Nadav Amit , Kees Cook , Brian Gerst , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , Linus Torvalds , Josh Poimboeuf , Jann Horn , Heiko Carstens , Andy Lutomirski List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org If we overflow the stack into a guard page, we'll recursively fault when trying to dump the contents of the guard page. Use probe_kernel_address so we can recover if this happens. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski --- arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c index 603356a5597a..5e298638c790 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, stack = sp; for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) { + unsigned long word; + if (stack >= irq_stack && stack <= irq_stack_end) { if (stack == irq_stack_end) { stack = (unsigned long *) (irq_stack_end[-1]); @@ -285,12 +287,18 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, if (kstack_end(stack)) break; } + + if (probe_kernel_address(stack, word)) + break; + if ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0) { if (i != 0) pr_cont("\n"); - printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, *stack++); + printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, word); } else - pr_cont(" %016lx", *stack++); + pr_cont(" %016lx", word); + + stack++; touch_nmi_watchdog(); } preempt_enable(); -- 2.5.5 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:43:41 -0700 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 11/13] x86/dumpstack/64: Handle faults when printing the "Stack:" part of an OOPS To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Nadav Amit , Kees Cook , Brian Gerst , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , Linus Torvalds , Josh Poimboeuf , Jann Horn , Heiko Carstens , Andy Lutomirski List-ID: If we overflow the stack into a guard page, we'll recursively fault when trying to dump the contents of the guard page. Use probe_kernel_address so we can recover if this happens. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski --- arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c index 603356a5597a..5e298638c790 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c @@ -276,6 +276,8 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, stack = sp; for (i = 0; i < kstack_depth_to_print; i++) { + unsigned long word; + if (stack >= irq_stack && stack <= irq_stack_end) { if (stack == irq_stack_end) { stack = (unsigned long *) (irq_stack_end[-1]); @@ -285,12 +287,18 @@ show_stack_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs, if (kstack_end(stack)) break; } + + if (probe_kernel_address(stack, word)) + break; + if ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0) { if (i != 0) pr_cont("\n"); - printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, *stack++); + printk("%s %016lx", log_lvl, word); } else - pr_cont(" %016lx", *stack++); + pr_cont(" %016lx", word); + + stack++; touch_nmi_watchdog(); } preempt_enable(); -- 2.5.5