From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36160C47083 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07080613D7 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 03:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229864AbhFCDiw (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:38:52 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-f45.google.com ([209.85.161.45]:46844 "EHLO mail-oo1-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229625AbhFCDir (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 23:38:47 -0400 Received: by mail-oo1-f45.google.com with SMTP id x22-20020a4a62160000b0290245cf6b7feeso1079315ooc.13 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:36:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+4S5cillMkGmkj7CPEP2zgPOj2VGFqFoGJmjqdd2zV8=; b=aQM7zJy7YlA9JBm6g0Mgqd0CGswohBU7MYinOtdzgNvmdeObhb60HOrs+T9esuZe8q YaGQYQY8A6oYL81SlTOngsSPhWDeU5rYPNrvhbPCLBJrcpaCrULhD8XCKmyg2R9Q6WtB 9F5mET5iB27AmuBDeQTYiwNIPSQhEu9ztV8Af4HaUlg6uqHxT0S+50P19i05rl0YVW0Y r66QA90r3vqwNi1fqQhCYlCxJFyW+XQpOTgOvapzn8XlCw6udhv64VSaNnWO1NKEGUhH EeGWORTAUFMQPA7C7LI4YHNI8IVL6b65tg4usPd1lePpi+u5oAVH15W5gncyNmiJ2UiF Ay8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+4S5cillMkGmkj7CPEP2zgPOj2VGFqFoGJmjqdd2zV8=; b=rtuMmotMmD+JzKteOd7GXp5p//SIHceTO0z46sx6Ys+6LiOFMY2OtuPp1CuelQWRe7 J4SjSuyK8FHRT7Fk3S8DPN9wTWWEhiLGrAxHb+gBRqpvTvoissjhEmHO6mXaSuqlLIMD IRFz435dRXha8Q438kXidwsa+h+ugkjs8+jQ/hfJ3KqRcS0TIj0Dcmr1iLmPOpD2XXxk oRQdTw+0dDBjpl6NuyzA9gIahfQrKLPqjfNGGip2mKsTvgxrwi5jd5KxH32Ac+hZAp6V qCzYgc/sj2SkhGe5amGpVgFzaDm/BZSFR6DNkqpMjCnz34D9jV84ZoN2hm8XObweSTm9 2QRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uGokZ8gARbVw/89Gv63q9B5cppNBFPrCtqYbdyPvHf+gnCVNr pSEORxKc3KZsjlT54oJcK9o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUUo7EnGVf9BcjXbq44ZT04LL9Jo+2UawM21bCpyevq0FXTmlMuzqz5TEpasrdfRH6mkaB9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:b4cd:: with SMTP id g13mr26865927ooo.4.1622691110616; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Davids-MacBook-Pro.local ([8.48.134.22]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w200sm91493oie.10.2021.06.02.20.31.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/5] Support for the IOAM Pre-allocated Trace with IPv6 To: Justin Iurman Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, tom@herbertland.com References: <20210527151652.16074-1-justin.iurman@uliege.be> <85a22702-da46-30c2-46c9-66d293d510ff@gmail.com> <1049853171.33683948.1622305441066.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> <1439349685.35359322.1622462654030.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> From: David Ahern Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 21:31:48 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1439349685.35359322.1622462654030.JavaMail.zimbra@uliege.be> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 5/31/21 6:04 AM, Justin Iurman wrote: >>> Actually, February 2021 is the last update. The main draft >>> (draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data) has already come a long way (version 12) and has >>> already been Submitted to IESG for Publication. I don't think it would hurt >> >> when the expected decision on publication? > > Hard to tell precisely, a couple weeks probably. There are still some comment/discuss to clear and our next IETF working group meeting is in July. However, it shouldn't be a concern (see below).\ Ok. > >> that much to have it in the kernel as we're talking about a stable >> draft (the other one is just a wrapper to define the encapsulation of >> IOAM with IPv6) and something useful. And, if you think about Segment >> Routing for IPv6, it was merged in the kernel when it was still a draft. >> >> The harm is if there are any changes to the uapi. > > Definitely agree. But, I can assure you there won't be any uapi change at this stage. None of the comment/discuss I mentioned above are about this at all. Headers definition and IANA codes are defined for a long time now and won't change anymore. > Please add tests to tools/testing/selftests/net to cover the functionality added.