From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941013AbcKXNEN (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:04:13 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36387 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756822AbcKXNEM (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:04:12 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcov: support GCC 7.1 To: Peter Oberparleiter References: <8c4084fa-3885-29fe-5fc4-0d4ca199c785@suse.cz> <85a7ed9a-4915-49d9-f17b-888b838107c6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: lkml From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:46:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <85a7ed9a-4915-49d9-f17b-888b838107c6@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/09/2016 10:21 AM, Peter Oberparleiter wrote: > On 31.10.2016 10:35, Martin Liška wrote: >> Starting from GCC 7.1, __gcov_exit is a new symbol expected >> to be implemented in a profiling runtime. > > I tested your patch with kernel 4.9-rc4 compiled with GCC 7.0.0 20161107 > (experimental) and validated that it fixes the build error due to a > missing __gcov_exit symbol. > > An attempt to read from one of the .gcda files generated by a kernel > compiled this way resulted in a crash though. It appears that the number > of GCOV_COUNTERS has changed again for GCC 7.x and must be adjusted in > the kernel as well. Could you add that to your patch as well? Hello. Sorry, this is fixed in second version of the patch. > > Given that GCC 7.1 has not yet been released, I'm wondering if it is > safe to program against interfaces that have not yet been fully > finalized. Can you provide an indication on whether these gcov-related > aspects of GCC might still be changed until release? Well, we just flipped to stage3 which means that any new features should be added to current master. If you prefer we can commit the patch after a release of 7.1 will be done? > > As a side note, please post your patches inline instead of as attachment > as that helps quoting them in replies. See also > linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > Sure, thanks for info. I'm attaching new version: Starting from GCC 7.1, __gcov_exit is a new symbol expected to be implemented in a profiling runtime. Update number of profile counters. Signed-off-by: Martin Liska --- kernel/gcov/base.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/gcov/base.c b/kernel/gcov/base.c index 2f9df37..85dca5d 100644 --- a/kernel/gcov/base.c +++ b/kernel/gcov/base.c @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ void __gcov_merge_icall_topn(gcov_type *counters, unsigned int n_counters) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__gcov_merge_icall_topn); +void __gcov_exit (void) +{ + /* Unused. */ +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__gcov_exit); + /** * gcov_enable_events - enable event reporting through gcov_event() * diff --git a/kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c b/kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c index 6a5c239..46a18e7 100644 --- a/kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c +++ b/kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ #include #include "gcov.h" -#if (__GNUC__ > 5) || (__GNUC__ == 5 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1) +#if (__GNUC__ >= 7) +#define GCOV_COUNTERS 9 +#elif (__GNUC__ > 5) || (__GNUC__ == 5 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1) #define GCOV_COUNTERS 10 #elif __GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 9 #define GCOV_COUNTERS 9 -- 2.10.2