From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx06.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FFD60C9C for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.signet.nl (smtp1.signet.nl [83.96.147.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CD99356D9 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 10:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dds.nl (app2.dds.nl [81.21.136.118]) by smtp1.signet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76BC64E76 for ; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:53:28 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 11:53:26 +0100 From: Xen In-Reply-To: <181942124.99954.1511342208833@mail.yahoo.com> References: <181942124.99954.1511342208833.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <181942124.99954.1511342208833@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Reattach cache Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com matthew patton schreef op 22-11-2017 10:16: > by definition when you detach a cache it is now entirely invalid and > will (should) be treated as empty. Yeah but it wasn't. Within seconds the rootfs was readonly and because I was running some apt thing at the same time, now a large bunch of packages became corrupted in the apt index (dpkg index). A bunch are still missing md5 files but I am on limited bandwidth so not reinstalling. So I assumed the above that you write. But it bit me once more.