All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>,
	Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
Cc: Franky Lin <franky.lin@broadcom.com>,
	Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
	Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com>,
	Wright Feng <wright.feng@cypress.com>,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, faiz_abbas@ti.com,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
	brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Issue with Broadcom wireless in 5.2rc1 (was Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: queue work after sdhci_defer_done())
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 10:48:24 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e7818bf9-a1d1-24b8-360d-62d7493afa91@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190526195819.GA29665@basecamp>

On 26/05/19 10:58 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 08:42:21PM +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 5/26/2019 2:21 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
>>> + Broadcom wireless maintainers
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:49:58AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 03:17:13PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>>> On 24/05/19 2:10 PM, Brian Masney wrote:
>>>>>> WiFi stopped working on the LG Nexus 5 phone and the issue was bisected
>>>>>> to the commit c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet") that
>>>>>> moved from using a tasklet to a work queue. That patch also changed
>>>>>> sdhci_irq() to return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD instead of finishing the work when
>>>>>> sdhci_defer_done() is true. Change it to queue work to the complete work
>>>>>> queue if sdhci_defer_done() is true so that the functionality is
>>>>>> equilivent to what was there when the finish_tasklet was present. This
>>>>>> corrects the WiFi breakage on the Nexus 5 phone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
>>>>>> Fixes: c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove finish_tasklet")
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> [ ... ]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>>>>> index 97158344b862..3563c3bc57c9 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>>>>> @@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ static irqreturn_t sdhci_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>>>>>   			continue;
>>>>>>   		if (sdhci_defer_done(host, mrq)) {
>>>>>> -			result = IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
>>>>>> +			queue_work(host->complete_wq, &host->complete_work);
>>>>>
>>>>> The IRQ thread has a lot less latency than the work queue, which is why it
>>>>> is done that way.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not sure why you say this change is equivalent to what was there
>>>>> before, nor why it fixes your problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you explain some more?
>>>>
>>>> [ ... ]
>>>>
>>>> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c calls
>>>> sdio_claim_host() and it appears to never return.

This is because SDHCI is using the IRQ thread to process the SDIO card
interrupt (sdio_run_irqs()).  When the card driver tries to use the card, it
causes interrupts which deadlocks since c07a48c26519 ("mmc: sdhci: Remove
finish_tasklet") has moved the tasklet processing to the IRQ thread.

I would expect to be able to use the IRQ thread to complete requests, and it
is desirable to do so because it is lower latency.

Probably, SDHCI should use sdio_signal_irq() which queues a work item, and
is what other drivers are doing.

I will investigate some more and send a patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-27  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-24 11:10 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: queue work after sdhci_defer_done() Brian Masney
2019-05-24 12:17 ` Adrian Hunter
2019-05-24 13:02   ` Brian Masney
2019-05-24 15:49   ` Brian Masney
2019-05-26 12:21     ` Issue with Broadcom wireless in 5.2rc1 (was Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: queue work after sdhci_defer_done()) Brian Masney
2019-05-26 18:42       ` Arend Van Spriel
2019-05-26 19:58         ` Brian Masney
2019-05-26 19:58           ` Brian Masney
2019-05-27  7:48           ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2019-05-27  9:37           ` Brian Masney
2019-05-27  9:37             ` Brian Masney
2019-05-27 12:08             ` Adrian Hunter
2019-05-27 12:50               ` Brian Masney
2019-05-28 20:11                 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-06-04 11:33               ` Arend Van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e7818bf9-a1d1-24b8-360d-62d7493afa91@intel.com \
    --to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com \
    --cc=chi-hsien.lin@cypress.com \
    --cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
    --cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
    --cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=wright.feng@cypress.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.