From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Carrier Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:01:09 +0000 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] infra: add the transient download mechanism In-Reply-To: <20200116103120.7b41295a@windsurf> References: <20200115203753.12110-1-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> <534f269547ead6d86e7a571978b54d79cd24cd0d.camel@orolia.com> <20200116103120.7b41295a@windsurf> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, > However, one question that is raised by Yann's patch is whether we > want > to forbid using branches when TRANSIENT_DOWNLOAD is NO. > Just to be sure I understand, when you say "when TRANSIENT_DOWNLOAD is NO.", it'd be the same as if TRANSIENT_DOWNLOAD download is not defined at all, right? If it's the case, then that seems to me like a good idea, because it renders explicit the risk taken by the user when using a branch (which can be done unknowingly ATM). > Best regards, > > Thomas > -- > Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com > ATTENTION: This email came from an external source. > Do not open attachments or click on links from unknown senders or > unexpected emails.