From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:20333 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932274AbcI0Oxd (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:53:33 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [1/2] ath9k: change entropy formula for easier understanding From: Kalle Valo In-Reply-To: <1470726147-30095-1-git-send-email-miaoqing@codeaurora.org> References: <1470726147-30095-1-git-send-email-miaoqing@codeaurora.org> To: miaoqing pan CC: , , , , , , Miaoqing Pan Message-ID: (sfid-20160927_165344_947449_D6665A42) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:53:23 +0200 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: miaoqing pan wrote: > From: Miaoqing Pan > > The quality of ADC entropy is 10 bits of min-entropy for > a 32-bit value, change '(((x) * 8 * 320) >> 10)' to > '(((x) * 8 * 10) >> 5)' for easier understanding. > > Signed-off-by: Miaoqing Pan I need some help here, it this patch ok to take or should I drop it? The discussion is available from the patchwork link below if someone needs to refresh the memory. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9270463/ Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status from patchwork: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kalle Valo Subject: Re: [1/2] ath9k: change entropy formula for easier understanding Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 16:53:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1470726147-30095-1-git-send-email-miaoqing@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , , , Miaoqing Pan To: miaoqing pan Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1470726147-30095-1-git-send-email-miaoqing-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-crypto.vger.kernel.org miaoqing pan wrote: > From: Miaoqing Pan > > The quality of ADC entropy is 10 bits of min-entropy for > a 32-bit value, change '(((x) * 8 * 320) >> 10)' to > '(((x) * 8 * 10) >> 5)' for easier understanding. > > Signed-off-by: Miaoqing Pan I need some help here, it this patch ok to take or should I drop it? The discussion is available from the patchwork link below if someone needs to refresh the memory. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9270463/ Documentation about submitting wireless patches and checking status from patchwork: https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches