From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69FBC54E8A for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFE72082E for ; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728775AbgEJHJG (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2020 03:09:06 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:57318 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728332AbgEJHJA (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2020 03:09:00 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 04A73CE5116933; Sun, 10 May 2020 03:08:55 -0400 Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30ws9xcehs-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 May 2020 03:08:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 04A75SgU026141; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:08:52 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30wm55j2cw-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 10 May 2020 07:08:52 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 04A78nXw47775772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 10 May 2020 07:08:50 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBB842049; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:08:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB5C42041; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:08:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (unknown [9.199.61.127]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 10 May 2020 07:08:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Ritesh Harjani To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , tytso@mit.edu, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ritesh Harjani Subject: [RFCv4 5/6] ext4: mballoc: Refactor ext4_mb_discard_preallocations() Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 12:38:25 +0530 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-10_02:2020-05-08,2020-05-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=1 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005100060 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Implement ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry() which we will need in later patches to add more logic like check for sequence number match to see if we should retry for block allocation or not. There should be no functionality change in this patch. Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index 574ce400a3b5..c18670924bbe 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -4570,6 +4570,17 @@ static int ext4_mb_discard_preallocations(struct super_block *sb, int needed) return freed; } +static bool ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry(struct super_block *sb, + struct ext4_allocation_context *ac) +{ + int freed; + + freed = ext4_mb_discard_preallocations(sb, ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len); + if (freed) + return true; + return false; +} + /* * Main entry point into mballoc to allocate blocks * it tries to use preallocation first, then falls back @@ -4578,7 +4589,6 @@ static int ext4_mb_discard_preallocations(struct super_block *sb, int needed) ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_allocation_request *ar, int *errp) { - int freed; struct ext4_allocation_context *ac = NULL; struct ext4_sb_info *sbi; struct super_block *sb; @@ -4683,8 +4693,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle, ar->len = ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len; } } else { - freed = ext4_mb_discard_preallocations(sb, ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len); - if (freed) + if (ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry(sb, ac)) goto repeat; /* * If block allocation fails then the pa allocated above -- 2.21.0