From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34888 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725740AbeILFJ3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Sep 2018 01:09:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:07:45 -0700 From: Rajkumar Manoharan To: =?UTF-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, Felix Fietkau Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/4] mac80211: Add airtime accounting and scheduling to TXQs In-Reply-To: <87h8ixli4s.fsf@toke.dk> References: <153635803319.14170.10011969968767927187.stgit@alrua-x1> <153635897061.14170.17999956909203163571.stgit@alrua-x1> <1536567496.3224.36.camel@sipsolutions.net> <87h8ixli4s.fsf@toke.dk> Message-ID: (sfid-20180912_020749_422566_777C5CDD) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2018-09-10 04:13, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > Johannes Berg writes: >>> - txqi->flags & (1<>> - txqi->flags & (1<>> - txqi->flags & (1<>> ""); >>> + txqi->flags & (1 << IEEE80211_TXQ_STOP) ? "STOP" : "RUN", >>> + txqi->flags & (1 << IEEE80211_TXQ_AMPDU) ? " AMPDU" : "", >>> + txqi->flags & (1 << IEEE80211_TXQ_NO_AMSDU) ? " NO-AMSDU" >>> : ""); >> >> consider BIT() instead as a cleanup? :) >> >> (or maybe this is just a leftover from merging some other patches?) > > Yeah, this is a merging artifact; Rajkumar's patch added another flag, > that I removed again. Didn't notice that there was still a whitespace > change in this patch... > I added the flag based on our last discussion. The driver needs to check txq status for each tx_dequeue(). One time txq check is not sufficient as it allows the driver to dequeue all frames from txq. drv_func() { while (ieee80211_airtime_may_transmit(txq) && hw_has_space() && (pkt = ieee80211_tx_dequeue(hw, txq))) push_to_hw(pkt); } >>> +bool ieee80211_txq_may_transmit(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, >>> + struct ieee80211_txq *txq) >>> +{ >>> + struct ieee80211_local *local = hw_to_local(hw); >>> + struct txq_info *txqi = to_txq_info(txq); >>> + bool may_tx = false; >>> + >>> + spin_lock_bh(&local->active_txq_lock); >>> + >>> + if (ieee80211_txq_check_deficit(local, txqi)) { >>> + may_tx = true; >>> + list_del_init(&txqi->schedule_order); >> To handle above case, may_transmit should remove the node only when it is in list. if (list_empty(&txqi->schedule_order)) list_del_init(&txqi->schedule_order); So that it can be used to determine whether txq is running negative. -Rajkumar