[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
index 437f6eba..4c3f0a47 100644
--- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
+++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
 
-PR = "r6"
+PR = "r7"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
 
-SRCREV = "a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510"
+SRCREV = "c66dd9b8467472278803c2426098a2828c93ebcc"
-- 
2.17.1

[dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb | 2 +-
 recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
index 4654d92d..834df5ff 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-5.10:"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-rt-linux-5.10.y"
 
-SRCREV = "afe9ba17bb94cd226f9e5dc3685e4fe32be28c5c"
+SRCREV = "433ef931c699f08bef8c67de8458302c5f971c8b"
 PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
index 72a6c49c..47f1669e 100644
--- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
 
 BRANCH = "ti-linux-5.10.y"
 
-SRCREV = "72d727fe733f2610e937a063bcebedce329948ec"
+SRCREV = "ae876c7c91df646ab198331e676f250f06cfdeb5"
 PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
 
 # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild
-- 
2.17.1

[dunfell/master PATCH] conf: am65xx-evm: ReIntroduce display overlays for 5.10

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

commit 9ea50db095f9 ("conf: am65xx-evm: Remove non-existent dtb* from 5.10")
removed all non-existent dtb* for j7-evm as they were not
available on linux 5.10 branch at that time.

This patch reintroduces following display overlays.
- k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo
- k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
index 7cc3ddcc..8516ca4c 100644
--- a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
+++ b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE = " \
     ti/k3-am654-sr1.dtbo \
     ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb2.dtbo \
     ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb3.dtbo \
+    ti/k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo \
+    ti/k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo \
 "
 
 BBMULTICONFIG += "k3r5-sr2"
-- 
2.17.1

[dunfell/master PATCH] conf/machine: am64xx: Add overlay to support icssg1-dualemac

[praneeth]

From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>

This patch adds overlay to support icssg1-dualemac
ie: 1 x CPSW3g ports and 2 x ICSSG1 ports configuration

overlay: k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtbo

Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
---
 conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc b/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc
index a46a50ed..95fdc79d 100644
--- a/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc
+++ b/conf/machine/include/am64xx.inc
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SERIAL_CONSOLES_CHECK = "${SERIAL_CONSOLES}"
 KERNEL_DEVICETREE = " \
     ti/k3-am642-evm.dtb \
     ti/k3-am642-sk.dtb \
+    ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtbo \
 "
 
 # AM64 supports multi-certificate images, use the same
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [dunfell/master PATCH] conf: am65xx-evm: ReIntroduce display overlays for 5.10

[praneeth]

On 6/7/2021 7:02 PM, praneeth@ti.com wrote:
> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> 
> commit 9ea50db095f9 ("conf: am65xx-evm: Remove non-existent dtb* from 5.10")
> removed all non-existent dtb* for j7-evm as they were not
> available on linux 5.10 branch at that time.

Will send a V2, this commit message is not accurate.


> 
> This patch reintroduces following display overlays.
> - k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo
> - k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> ---
>   conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
> index 7cc3ddcc..8516ca4c 100644
> --- a/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
> +++ b/conf/machine/include/am65xx.inc
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE = " \
>       ti/k3-am654-sr1.dtbo \
>       ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb2.dtbo \
>       ti/k3-am654-pcie-usb3.dtbo \
> +    ti/k3-am654-evm-tc358876.dtbo \
> +    ti/k3-am654-evm-oldi-lcd1evm.dtbo \
>   "
>   
>   BBMULTICONFIG += "k3r5-sr2"
> 

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

Series looks good to me, including v2. Maybe better to specify sequence number 
[PATCH 01/04] to keep the order?

Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>


On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:51PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> 
> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
> ---
>  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> index 437f6eba..4c3f0a47 100644
> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>  
>  LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>  
> -PR = "r6"
> +PR = "r7"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>  
> -SRCREV = "a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510"
> +SRCREV = "c66dd9b8467472278803c2426098a2828c93ebcc"
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
PGP: 0x420902729A92C964 - https://denix.org/0x420902729A92C964
Fingerprint: 25FC E4A5 8A72 2F69 1186  6D76 4209 0272 9A92 C964

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[Lukas Wunner]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:52PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
> index 4654d92d..834df5ff 100644
> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
> @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-5.10:"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-rt-linux-5.10.y"
>  
> -SRCREV = "afe9ba17bb94cd226f9e5dc3685e4fe32be28c5c"
> +SRCREV = "433ef931c699f08bef8c67de8458302c5f971c8b"
>  PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> index 72a6c49c..47f1669e 100644
> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>  
>  BRANCH = "ti-linux-5.10.y"
>  
> -SRCREV = "72d727fe733f2610e937a063bcebedce329948ec"
> +SRCREV = "ae876c7c91df646ab198331e676f250f06cfdeb5"
>  PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
>  
>  # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild

This doesn't apply cleanly to any of the dunfell, dunfell-next nor master
branches.  SRCREV is currently 8fbd16658d11 and d85aee3e19aa, respectively
on those branches.

Which branch did you base this patch on?

Thanks,

Lukas

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] ti-uboot-staging: Update to the latest ti-u-boot-2021.01

[praneeth]

On 6/7/21 7:30 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> Series looks good to me, including v2. Maybe better to specify sequence number
> [PATCH 01/04] to keep the order?

Thanks for the feedback.

Will do, Will send a updated version for the kernel and overlay patches 
today once the kernel tree gets updated.

The uboot patch can go independently.

> 
> Acked-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys@konsulko.com>
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:51PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> From: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>>
>> Update to the latest commit of ti-u-boot-2021.01
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> index 437f6eba..4c3f0a47 100644
>> --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti-staging_2021.01.bb
>> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ require u-boot-ti.inc
>>   
>>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://Licenses/README;md5=5a7450c57ffe5ae63fd732446b988025"
>>   
>> -PR = "r6"
>> +PR = "r7"
>>   
>>   BRANCH = "ti-u-boot-2021.01"
>>   
>> -SRCREV = "a6e78929575b6969c15ced9685441fc430ee9510"
>> +SRCREV = "c66dd9b8467472278803c2426098a2828c93ebcc"
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[praneeth]

On 6/8/21 9:04 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 07:02:52PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
>> index 4654d92d..834df5ff 100644
>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging-rt_5.10.bb
>> @@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}-5.10:"
>>   
>>   BRANCH = "ti-rt-linux-5.10.y"
>>   
>> -SRCREV = "afe9ba17bb94cd226f9e5dc3685e4fe32be28c5c"
>> +SRCREV = "433ef931c699f08bef8c67de8458302c5f971c8b"
>>   PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
>> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
>> index 72a6c49c..47f1669e 100644
>> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ti-staging_5.10.bb
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>>   
>>   BRANCH = "ti-linux-5.10.y"
>>   
>> -SRCREV = "72d727fe733f2610e937a063bcebedce329948ec"
>> +SRCREV = "ae876c7c91df646ab198331e676f250f06cfdeb5"
>>   PV = "5.10.35+git${SRCPV}"
>>   
>>   # Append to the MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so that a new SRCREV will cause a rebuild
> 
> This doesn't apply cleanly to any of the dunfell, dunfell-next nor master
> branches.  SRCREV is currently 8fbd16658d11 and d85aee3e19aa, respectively
> on those branches.
> 
> Which branch did you base this patch on?

The patch was made based on dunfell-next.
The conflict is seen because dunfell-next is not in sync with dunfell yet.
Once the following patches are pulled to dunfell branch, the patch can 
be applied cleanly. I am sending a v2 shortly.

Ref:
2de2c5ec linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA
6983b50e linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to 5.10.35

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lukas
> 

Re: [meta-ti] [dunfell/master PATCH] linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA

[Lukas Wunner]

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 07:40:07PM -0500, praneeth via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> On 6/8/21 9:04 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > This doesn't apply cleanly to any of the dunfell, dunfell-next nor master
> > branches.  SRCREV is currently 8fbd16658d11 and d85aee3e19aa, respectively
> > on those branches.
> > 
> > Which branch did you base this patch on?
> 
> The patch was made based on dunfell-next.
> The conflict is seen because dunfell-next is not in sync with dunfell yet.
> Once the following patches are pulled to dunfell branch, the patch can be
> applied cleanly. I am sending a v2 shortly.
> 
> Ref:
> 2de2c5ec linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to the latest commit SHA
> 6983b50e linux-ti-staging: Update 5.10 kernel to 5.10.35

It looks like dunfell-next wasn't pushed to git.ti.com, hence when I
fetched yesterday afternoon, the above-quoted commits were missing on
the branch:

$ cat .git/logs/refs/remotes/origin/dunfell-next
542456ca082de7133a61be21222d13974a87e41d f0abcc93b2bd272f2fc3a6ecc13f44f9658e1217 Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> 1620636780 +0200	pull --rebase: fast-forward
f0abcc93b2bd272f2fc3a6ecc13f44f9658e1217 99cf543ee385677589edc6bd132068c5a710803f Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> 1623076459 +0200	pull --rebase: fast-forward

$ date -j -f%s 1623076459
Mo  7 Jun 2021 16:34:19 CEST

But in the meantime the branch was pushed, so I've now
fetched the missing commits.

Thanks!

Lukas