From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854BDFA372B for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEA3205F4 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:31:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3AEA3205F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:42210 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiSr-0006u9-Az for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:31:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiRB-00068w-JU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:29:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiR9-0007IB-8m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:29:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKiR8-0007HD-8w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 08:29:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A43842A09AC for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id m14so11658076wru.17 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KTNVPCfAtsBJaymnRnOuNp99smFnFCwT4/Aboxj1660=; b=Y8NKEXb1D5+aFyjts/qveOB93rohadTT4hPugbTyWAHbO38st9rUVr8JZ4jYq5158g YsxkP2e/iBv5DaQzavePLymo/BITituMhNMd8mlvGhWBjDFAJofO5E3DpWXhjbVS7b9b ujW8yGc+oRGwUTLeoVaDMyLF3Rfe7LSxdESVQpls8picYrNmhZVArcZKTG22zqR2711Z eObBY9/dBJxDzkmQeUjP/ceqMKdnCyz3qbEGLQ7VmPa24IzEi3Km/xvjtDlO9b5XuVky cLr372H37lh2WJZuLakds45LDj9OSjKH6bTLd6x+8HT/8MyaPtNmlPKYo01moNAcYCph DpiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpzdfP5NRqWhC7PNnZdNO62jYhdByJvV4Qpjvivxn5VUXFCiX5 j1wBEFz5S5LV5t+dVkmrJEyvY9roY0PK7IcuJUeVRU7dMrotJBR6xMUSC0X33eyo9QsfSyCkPUE 1si5HW4JnJm0VBJA= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa47:: with SMTP id y7mr2508101wrr.93.1571228990754; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:29:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxc2nXzmk6yIjbeRBl0Svkc9E0JGB/HpxPmfbGKYLOyAWKroEjKLBRyzLpwtF5U+gOJqWfFAw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa47:: with SMTP id y7mr2508088wrr.93.1571228990558; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.36] (14.red-88-21-201.staticip.rima-tde.net. [88.21.201.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm31394714wrt.75.2019.10.16.05.29.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [SeaBIOS] Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] bootdevice: FW_CFG interface for LCHS values To: Laszlo Ersek , Sam Eiderman References: <20190925110639.100699-1-sameid@google.com> <20190925110639.100699-8-sameid@google.com> <7dc7b14c-8e89-4851-6d05-d69b1bf36e3e@redhat.com> <92b719a7-3838-b019-cd51-5f5b2120a431@redhat.com> <1d863ce2-0e45-63e4-ceb2-d2eb2d9aa03a@redhat.com> <1dc0c7cd-cf9f-0c33-04f5-ed8d89119c9f@redhat.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:29:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, arbel.moshe@oracle.com, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kraxel@redhat.com, John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 10/16/19 2:14 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Hi Sam, > > On 10/16/19 13:02, Sam Eiderman wrote: >> Gentle Ping, >> >> Philippe, John? >> >> Just wondering if the series is okay, as Gerd pointed out this series >> is a blocker for the corresponding changes in SeaBIOS for v 1.13 > > The QEMU series is still not merged, due to a bug in the last patch > (namely, the test case, "hd-geo-test: Add tests for lchs override"). > > To my knowledge, SeaBIOS prefers to merge patches with the underlying > QEMU patches merged first, so you'll likely have to fix that QEMU issue > first. > > I explained the bug in the QEMU test case here: > > http://mid.mail-archive.com/6b00dc74-7267-8ce8-3271-5db269edb1b7@redhat.com > http://mid.mail-archive.com/700cd594-1446-e478-fb03-d2e6b862dc6c@redhat.com Yes, I was expecting a respin with find_fw_cfg_file() fixed per Laszlo detailed review. > (Alternative links to the same: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01790.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-10/msg01793.html > ) > > I've never received feedback to those messages, and I think you must > have missed them. > > FWIW, when I hit "Reply All" in that thread, you were on the "To:" list > with: > > Sam Eiderman > > but here you are present with > > Sam Eiderman > > In addition, when I posted those messages, I got the following > auto-response ("Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"): > >> This is the mail system at host mx1.redhat.com. >> >> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not >> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. >> >> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. >> >> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can >> delete your own text from the attached returned message. >> >> The mail system >> >> : host >> aserp2030.oracle.com[141.146.126.74] said: >> 550 5.1.1 Unknown recipient address. (in reply to RCPT TO command) That explains it :) > > I didn't know your new address, so I could only hope you'd find my > feedback on qemu-devel. > > Thanks > Laszlo >