From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Len Baker <len.baker@gmx.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drivers/iio: Remove all strcpy() uses
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2021 09:58:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb51990402a466821b855092a3fa2171b5a98bcf.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210815163639.GA97260@titan>
On Sun, 2021-08-15 at 18:36 +0200, Len Baker wrote:
> Hi Joe,
Hello Len.
Don't take this advice too seriously, it's just bikeshedding
but it seems to me an unexpected use of a strcmp equivalent
in a non performance sensitive path.
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:06:45AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> > bikeshed:
> >
> > I think this change is less intelligible than the original strcmp.
>
> So, if I understand correctly you suggest to change the above line for:
> else if (strcmp(orient, "0") == 0)
Yes.
In kernel sources it's about 2:1 in favor of '!strcmp()' over 'strcmp() == 0'
$ git grep -P '\!\s*strcmp\b' | wc -l
3457
$ git grep -P '\bstrcmp\s*\([^\)]+\)\s*==\s*0\b' | wc -l
1719
And it's your choice to use one or the other or just your V4 patch.
btw, according to godbolt:
gcc -O2 doesn't call strcmp and produces the same object code as your
byte comparisons. clang 11 calls strcmp regardless of optimization level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-15 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-14 13:55 [PATCH v4] drivers/iio: Remove all strcpy() uses Len Baker
2021-08-14 19:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-08-15 8:19 ` Len Baker
2021-08-15 14:45 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-08-15 15:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-08-15 15:06 ` Joe Perches
2021-08-15 16:36 ` Len Baker
2021-08-15 16:58 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2021-08-15 17:12 ` Len Baker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb51990402a466821b855092a3fa2171b5a98bcf.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=len.baker@gmx.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.