From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB99C2B9F8 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85EF6108D for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B85EF6108D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.132160.246620 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llUww-0001Fd-0d; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:14 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 132160.246620; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llUwv-0001FW-Ta; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:13 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 132160; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:12 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llUwu-0001FQ-K0 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:12 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 4e61f08c-466f-49e1-81c1-d20ba199a94d; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A50AF1E; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:10:10 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 4e61f08c-466f-49e1-81c1-d20ba199a94d X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1621941010; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=4c9DPkZDWWjIpADE7/pAG+BfjKlKpEyZb+9oX4SaWDw=; b=TwnIHqoUXLdS5hFLXVi2ILIPQvzXD7b3EqmqdLDsl5FiXFFZUN1ol5zoXsRHx38Cjrhy26 GztfRBnqN3kgyjeKMqLQ8OFrusmyVAKBW8rdHQd/jLbR5jpFEEafXrIw19IsF4JJxbDm/W B0UeFj6O07lqqlQG9S2M4PWsx+An0Hw= Subject: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] firmware/shim: build adjustments From: Jan Beulich To: Andrew Cooper , Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= Cc: Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" References: <19695ffc-34d8-b682-b092-668f872d4e57@suse.com> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 13:10:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19695ffc-34d8-b682-b092-668f872d4e57@suse.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 30.04.2021 16:39, Jan Beulich wrote: > Originally I meant to finally get v2 of "firmware/shim: honor symlinks > during Xen tree setup" sorted. However, the suggestion to use find's > -L option, while a suitable equivalent of the -xtype primary, has the > same drawback: It doesn't distinguish between relative and absolute > symlinks (and we specifically want to skip relative ones). Locally I'm > using '(' -type f -o -lname '/*' ')' now, but -lname again being non- > standard I didn't think it would even be worth submitting. While > looking into that I did notice a few other anomalies, though, which > this series tries to address. > > I notice tools/firmware/xen-dir/ isn't included in "X86 ARCHITECTURE". > I wonder whether that should be added. > > 1: update linkfarm exclusions > 2: drop XEN_CONFIG_EXPERT uses > 3: UNSUPPORTED=n Ping? Jan