From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D38AC4338F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23EE61073 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:30:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org F23EE61073 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=walle.cc Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.denx.de Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF04A82986; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:30:35 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=walle.cc Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=walle.cc header.i=@walle.cc header.b="jyP2GFBQ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 9176080A22; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:30:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (ssl.serverraum.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:151:8464::1:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6162182DF6 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:30:29 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=walle.cc Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=michael@walle.cc Received: from ssl.serverraum.org (web.serverraum.org [172.16.0.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.serverraum.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D807022178; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:30:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=walle.cc; s=mail2016061301; t=1629901829; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xhbDVoLt3p2pOwIxyvg+SA5k0gZNunzXS/W+dTkdmeY=; b=jyP2GFBQtVoRiHnwTui0itkdeSUSc/fCu7yXxixF1g+c08E0Ydgphyl3hALGx5TPIWkCJh dz0FgD/3XtaAd0RdOj017noRxVknBFh8yLo1qOHG7cFzi4lzX8xiGUjCL8qdSeAC1bL+JT xz4cqXbztzjB1eY5j5ic1ZnNwxr289M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:30:28 +0200 From: Michael Walle To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Tom Rini , Priyanka Jain , u-boot@lists.denx.de, heiko.thiery@gmail.com Subject: Re: incompatible device trees between u-boot and linux In-Reply-To: <20210825141816.qfn25xlech55rwsg@skbuf> References: <51c2a92f6bf771769f1e2da5157727e8@walle.cc> <20210825140045.GR858@bill-the-cat> <20210825141816.qfn25xlech55rwsg@skbuf> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: X-Sender: michael@walle.cc X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Am 2021-08-25 16:18, schrieb Vladimir Oltean: > Curious that Michael mentions Ethernet and DSA on LS1028A. [..] > I mean, they look pretty similar to me? The biggest difference is that > the ENETC ECAM is under the /soc node in Linux, but under / in U-Boot, > as well as some BAR memory areas that are not marked as prefetchable or > non-prefetchable in the U-Boot device tree. But excuse me, that isn't > an > Ethernet/DSA problem, is it? Mh, you're right. I had something in mind you've mentioned during the initial DSA patches for u-boot. I must have remembered incorrectly. My intention was to have a clear message if the u-boot device tree should be following the linux one before I'm digging deeper into what is different between these two and try to sync both. -michael