From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cgxu519@gmx.com (cgxu519) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 07:34:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v4 0/3] staging: erofs: option validation for remount and some code cleanups In-Reply-To: <97e148db-1ab9-a76f-414e-bbeaa1a24eda@aol.com> References: <20180919145346.9927-1-cgxu519@gmx.com> <97e148db-1ab9-a76f-414e-bbeaa1a24eda@aol.com> Message-ID: On 9/19/18 11:22 PM, Gao Xiang wrote: > Hi Chengguang, > > On 2018/9/19 22:53, Chengguang Xu wrote: >> Hi Greg, Xiang >> >> I rebased code on latest erofs-master branch and that branch >> has already merged the first patch in my previous patchset, >> so this time I only post rest 3 patches. > Great, at the most time Chao's erofs-master is the same as Greg's > staging tree (currently it is), but I personally think all patches > could be better directly based on the final staging tree if these > patches has no real/effective dependency with some submitted patches > but haven't been applied by Greg (p.s. it should be avoided as > much as possible because community guys could find something > important like the yesterday patches). > > Once again, the detail information of branches is described in > https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linux-erofs/ > > I have nothing more to say, good luck :) > Thanks for the guide! Chengguang