From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ferruh Yigit Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: remove device reset in open Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 15:20:44 -0700 Message-ID: References: <506f596c-f7e3-56b1-d13a-17b49bc3945a@intel.com> <12814007.65nxXEtm0z@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , "Tan, Jianfeng" , Jingjing Wu , "Thotton, Shijith" , Gregory Etelson , "Patil, Harish" , dev@dpdk.org, George Prekas , Sergio Gonzalez Monroy , "Roberts, Lee A." To: Thomas Monjalon , "Mody, Rasesh" Return-path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E47C1B6A3 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 23:20:46 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <12814007.65nxXEtm0z@xps> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 11/3/2017 12:24 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 03/11/2017 20:18, Mody, Rasesh: >> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com] >>> On 11/2/2017 11:45 AM, Mody, Rasesh wrote: >>>> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com] >>>>> On 11/2/2017 10:34 AM, Mody, Rasesh wrote: >>>> We are ok as we have at least some way to disable the reset, please send a >>> patch. >>> >>> Sent http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/31143/, can you please test? >> >> The testing of BNX2X looks OK with this patch. However, the solution has following drawbacks: >> - an application will need to be recompiled to have the igb_uio kernel module rebuilt to support bnx2x devices >> - this will break pre-compiled solutions that are provided with an OS such as RHOSP or as part of a pre-compiled VNF >> >> We can live with this temporary solution for now. In the long term, we may have to revisit this. >> We are also looking at why bnx2x FLR is taking this long. > > Yes, I think the long term solution should be to fix your PMD > or your firmware. > Please keep us posted when you find the root cause with your device. > Thanks Lee Roberts suggested doing device specific action instead of build time option. I send following: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/31168/ What do you think about this approach? Meanwhile I will send a more proper patch to discuss on. Thanks, ferruh