From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Reindl Harald Subject: Re: hung grow Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:14:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7e23d39b-aebb-0852-c98f-758bd99d3eb9@turmel.org> <89992d1f-172f-9fc6-3a1e-50df34e11d3b@turmel.org> <87po9xyv0r.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <87d15xymgc.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <0d4987d9-e8ff-0cdb-6e45-7f962b75c189@turmel.org> <3e5766b0-1437-2857-4806-264386d1633f@youngman.org.uk> <6d4b7055-c26c-951e-b63c-273a7fe447b8@turmel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-CH Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Curt , Phil Turmel Cc: Anthony Youngman , NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Am 10.10.2017 um 16:11 schrieb Curt: > What are the chances if I just do an assemble and let it try to grow > again that it will complete without issue? Then assuming it completes, > that I will have most my data still? low what is "most of my data" in case of an array when your data are on top of that array in a filesystem which don't know anything about what happened with the phyiscal stuff underlying?