From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2MMX-0007Vu-9b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:03:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2MMS-00011D-Dj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:03:41 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.74]:54474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2MMS-00010l-4T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 14:03:36 -0400 References: <1478121319-31986-1-git-send-email-laurent@vivier.eu> <1478121319-31986-4-git-send-email-laurent@vivier.eu> <5d3713b1-c98e-d165-35b7-44b5ec616ec5@twiddle.net> From: Laurent Vivier Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 19:03:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5d3713b1-c98e-d165-35b7-44b5ec616ec5@twiddle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] target-m68k: add cas/cas2 ops List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, agraf@suse.de, gerg@uclinux.org Le 03/11/2016 à 17:36, Richard Henderson a écrit : > On 11/02/2016 03:15 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote: >> + if (c1 != l1) { >> + env->cc_n = l1; >> + env->cc_v = c1; >> + } else { >> + env->cc_n = l2; >> + env->cc_v = c2; >> + } >> + env->cc_op = CC_OP_CMPL; >> + env->dregs[Dc1] = deposit32(env->dregs[Dc1], 0, 16, l1); >> + env->dregs[Dc2] = deposit32(env->dregs[Dc2], 0, 16, l2); > > CC_OP_CMPW for cas2w. It was working because I have used helper_be_ldsw_mmu() to load values, is it better to use helper_be_lduw_mmu with CC_OP_CMPW? >> +DISAS_INSN(cas2l) >> +{ > ... >> + regs = tcg_const_i32(REG(ext2, 6) | >> + (REG(ext1, 6) << 3) | >> + (REG(ext2, 0) << 6) | >> + (REG(ext1, 0) << 9)); >> + gen_helper_cas2w(cpu_env, regs, addr1, addr2); > > cas2l. I should not use values with the high word equal to the low word to test this... Many thanks, Laurent