From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DB1DDF93 for ; Sat, 9 May 2009 03:23:20 +1000 (EST) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so847081ywt.39 for ; Fri, 08 May 2009 10:23:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: timur.tabi@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4A0457BC.3040408@dlasys.net> References: <4A0457BC.3040408@dlasys.net> Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 12:15:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: device trees. From: Timur Tabi To: dhlii@dlasys.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 11:03 AM, David H. Lynch Jr. wrot= e: > =A0 =A0Is there an example somewhere that shows building a device tree on > the fly ? A whole device tree? I don't think so. U-Boot does manipulate quite a few properties, but it assume that the DTS lists all the devices. Remember, one of the primary purposes of the DTS is to list devices that cannot be probed. --=20 Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale