From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.12401.1603796397429511273 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:59:57 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YObmS43T; spf=pass (domain: gmail.com, ip: 209.85.128.65, mailfrom: luca.boccassi@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id h22so957606wmb.0 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:59:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NS93aZh4rRkGY9TCuVGNKUORq0No+y3yo5DxJBKUyhA=; b=YObmS43TLqpYKi1NTJCw1hd22XgqfliPHgRxlxs9gSL1e9+49T1YVQg2mhBB9gpWA9 vbywEjwdsar0DYCLGRMm1o8Agw0F+TAaYFKGpUufAkmlgfcDow98E472193rgTwOj5Nk eUaUHRIRTvHgqqB/Ojo8p9dCmXsXR1Ih9mnQvBvkFK+a2FjbS92edGXyyXWa3xS1PUYe m/4eleq3qB8pd1vUiK5PR4c3KaVfSX02/J58UXv1Umjb5tkfLyVa//Xu2mU3dUjzWTJm aNjAj/V+Ig/oCHuM01fIFUrO9REYHQN4vozeXXx0kZfNxRVj7uFzsIJ0fuMI+UaAfpXa GYSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NS93aZh4rRkGY9TCuVGNKUORq0No+y3yo5DxJBKUyhA=; b=QNN5CY1nduvCjBMy5YrG/y+kmdZsqR7Z8wH2wl4CQULt3RCqNbEa2PhNJgfB9A8Fwg 0dTqvrAp86Z8PzDlkre+A7u6Ipjzth3n3e36dmqXIt1Iee+jejZ2+ctk85zxaEYAAtau cW9uuxCNU50LQJecglb1qBJkvRCwx5o2QHbsJOlbd+liG2mXWzkzR90FU6tazMna6q2b XtKLzrgWBwkXXHKZEszRWzIZDyoadriOPZ1cQ8tAeCPPD/nS0m8GaE3KIzd03ZhO4Ryw 8F18zK0Y3I/V8j0hVFaUJyL2xwFYwPGtLCAGgJwHYYh6NX7+PpRqGC2sxxaS8EDVkAC7 J+1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531X/Af2Uy3xRKvMl+13LKHdoFN/ng2h7yfcZnDjVMgqDJM1EljD b73hxeLb6v45x/MyIiQ/EbU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzJdNy92mZkVvm6wkz8k+BWwiEuezAv3ASGBlHdVLU+ptiI7RoS6eskAZmZfUPkagcsW9em7g== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ca51:: with SMTP id m17mr2140445wml.86.1603796395886; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from bluca-lenovo ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r3sm1516576wrm.51.2020.10.27.03.59.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 03:59:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Add new recipe for squashfs-tools-ng From: "Luca Bocassi" To: Richard Purdie , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:59:54 +0000 In-Reply-To: <4d2560d4440be40ecd73020c931d5bfd83fd9b1c.camel@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20201022113036.2938947-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <20201026100503.3200192-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> <2ad67eb9e783fa044d4d97f35f93a35014aa73e1.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <4d2560d4440be40ecd73020c931d5bfd83fd9b1c.camel@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 10:37 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 13:09 +0000, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 10:29 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 10:05 +0000, luca.boccassi@gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Luca Boccassi > > > > > > > > The main difference with squashfs-tools is the availability > > > > of a shared library and a programmatic interface, rather > > > > than just command-line tools. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi > > > > --- > > > > v2: added MIT, Zlib and BSD-2-Clause to LICENSE > > > > v3: fixed CPL-3.0+ tag, removed GPL2 from checksum (not used), > > > > changed > > > > recipe to be versioned, use bb.utils.filter in PACKAGE_CONFIG > > > > v4: disable zstd support by default, dependency not available in > > > > oe- > > > > core > > > > > > Sorry, there is one other issue. There is no maintainers entry for > > > this > > > recipe (see meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc) which would > > > cause > > > oe-selftest to fail. Can you add an maintainers entry please? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Richard > > > > Ok - who should be listed as maintainer? > > The person who is going to look after this recipe in OE-Core. Each > recipe needs to have a maintainer listed, someone who is prepared to > get the upgrade helper emails, handle upgrades, help with security > issues, bugs related to the recipe and so on. > > If we don't have anyone willing to maintain it, I'd argue its not > important enough to have in OE-Core... > > Cheers, > > Richard Ok, I'll move to meta-openembedded then. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi