From: Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com>
To: Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com>, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com>
Cc: "Development, Ceph" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Jewel 10.2.7 QE status
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:32:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ee7a7293-9b09-b2bb-a2fd-6435fa4f5379@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALqRxCwAkWmGCv4NwPG-Aamp9EM97H5k1ae7n9J5iFy5q7=NYw@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/06/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Hi Josh and Sage, are you ok with releasing v10.2.7 from jewel
> (a64d3e4b33e904aa6585464df8ffff6aafdec10c)?
Yes, the two failures are a race condition and a bug in the tests.
> test results passed at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19055#note-13
> (with known failures, as far as I can tell)
>
> - Ken
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>> There had been lengthy discussion in #ceph-devel regarding failed
>> upgrade tests, https://github.com/ceph/teuthology/pull/1055,
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429
>>
>> We need to decide what to do about this in context of this release.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Yuri Weinstein <yweinste@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Detailed summary of the QE Validation can be found here
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19055#note-13
>>> The following suites were in scope of this point release validation:
>>>
>>> rados (subset 35/50 227 jobceph-ansibles)
>>> rbd
>>> rgw
>>> fs
>>> krbd
>>> kcephfs
>>> knfs
>>> rest
>>> hadoop - EXCLUDED
>>> samba - EXCLUDED
>>> ceph-deploy
>>> ceph-disk
>>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel)
>>> upgrade/jewel-x/point-to-point-x
>>> powercycle
>>> ceph-ansible
>>>
>>> (please let me know if any suites are missing from this ^ list)
>>>
>>> =====================
>>> Outstanding issues
>>>
>>> rados - two jobs failed, need Josh's approval
>>> krbd - seems similar to previous release, need Ilya's approval
>>>
>>> upgrade/client-upgrade
>>> and
>>> upgrade/hammer-x (jewel) - suspect
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19429, need Sage/Josh approve
>>>
>>> Thx
>>> YuriW
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-06 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-05 20:16 Jewel 10.2.7 QE status Yuri Weinstein
2017-04-05 21:55 ` Yuri Weinstein
2017-04-06 16:23 ` Ken Dreyer
2017-04-06 17:32 ` Josh Durgin [this message]
2017-04-06 9:28 ` Ilya Dryomov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ee7a7293-9b09-b2bb-a2fd-6435fa4f5379@redhat.com \
--to=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kdreyer@redhat.com \
--cc=yweinste@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.