From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 iproute2-next 1/4] rdma: add helper rd_sendrecv_msg() Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:55:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20190223092615.GM23561@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <20190223093122.GO23561@mtr-leonro.mtl.com> <7f48fc85-45ab-fe7d-9614-4c5eb50f8401@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7f48fc85-45ab-fe7d-9614-4c5eb50f8401@opengridcomputing.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Wise , Leon Romanovsky Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 2/26/19 10:19 AM, Steve Wise wrote: > >> Will we need this recv_msg if we implement >> extack support? > > I'm not sure how extack works.  Do you know? see devlink/mnlg.c mnlg_socket_open() { ... mnl_socket_setsockopt(nlg->nl, NETLINK_EXT_ACK, &one, sizeof(one)); ... } and mnlg_cb_error() That code under devlink needs to be generic for both tools.