From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7885FC282DA for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6EE2173C for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732173AbfDQNIV (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:21 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:44536 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727034AbfDQNIU (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:20 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256AB374; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.0.144] (a075553-lin.blr.arm.com [10.162.0.144]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6279E3F59C; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest To: Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Christoffer Dall , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Andrew Jones , Dave Martin , Ramana Radhakrishnan , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Kristina Martsenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , James Morse , Julien Thierry References: <1555039236-10608-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> <1555039236-10608-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:38:13 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 4/17/19 2:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 12/04/2019 04:20, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> A per vcpu flag is added to check if pointer authentication is >> enabled for the vcpu or not. This flag may be enabled according to >> the necessary user policies and host capabilities. >> >> This patch also adds a helper to check the flag. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap >> Cc: Mark Rutland >> Cc: Marc Zyngier >> Cc: Christoffer Dall >> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu >> --- >> >> Changes since v8: >> * Added a new per vcpu flag which will store Pointer Authentication enable >> status instead of checking them again. [Dave Martin] >> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> index 9d57cf8..31dbc7c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> @@ -355,10 +355,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { >> #define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED (1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */ >> #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE (1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */ >> #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED (1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */ >> +#define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH (1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */ >> >> #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \ >> ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE)) >> >> +#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) \ >> + ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH) >> + > > Just as for SVE, please first check that the system has PTRAUTH. > Something like: > > (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) && \ > ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)) In the subsequent patches, vcpu->arch.flags is only set to KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH when all host capability check conditions matches such as system_supports_address_auth(), system_supports_generic_auth() so doing them again is repetitive in my view. Thanks, Amit D > > This will save an extra load on unsuspecting CPUs thanks to the static > key embedded in the capability structure. > > Thanks, > > M. > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E35C282DC for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395A22173C for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 395A22173C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BCE4A52D; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQ7F3uCUMrUn; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A954A515; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304644A4FF for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fXF0urwzXuhq for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D039F4A4CA for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:08:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256AB374; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.0.144] (a075553-lin.blr.arm.com [10.162.0.144]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6279E3F59C; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest To: Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1555039236-10608-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> <1555039236-10608-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:38:13 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Kristina Martsenko , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Ramana Radhakrishnan , Dave Martin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed" Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Message-ID: <20190417130813.ukMbDxDRBRw5Dq62i4m3yGIp_-VEXLU5489YH2w2LWE@z> Hi, On 4/17/19 2:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 12/04/2019 04:20, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> A per vcpu flag is added to check if pointer authentication is >> enabled for the vcpu or not. This flag may be enabled according to >> the necessary user policies and host capabilities. >> >> This patch also adds a helper to check the flag. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap >> Cc: Mark Rutland >> Cc: Marc Zyngier >> Cc: Christoffer Dall >> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu >> --- >> >> Changes since v8: >> * Added a new per vcpu flag which will store Pointer Authentication enable >> status instead of checking them again. [Dave Martin] >> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> index 9d57cf8..31dbc7c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> @@ -355,10 +355,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { >> #define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED (1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */ >> #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE (1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */ >> #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED (1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */ >> +#define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH (1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */ >> >> #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \ >> ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE)) >> >> +#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) \ >> + ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH) >> + > > Just as for SVE, please first check that the system has PTRAUTH. > Something like: > > (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) && \ > ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)) In the subsequent patches, vcpu->arch.flags is only set to KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH when all host capability check conditions matches such as system_supports_address_auth(), system_supports_generic_auth() so doing them again is repetitive in my view. Thanks, Amit D > > This will save an extra load on unsuspecting CPUs thanks to the static > key embedded in the capability structure. > > Thanks, > > M. > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E6DC282DA for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D802173C for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="b9+046GI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 66D802173C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=ZKeMY7Iwa3ywQ30rLGFvlSAwRK/0qR7JMLDIVEENgb8=; b=b9+046GIzNVd50OUzDnhoa7tR pQT5zrXGzc8KnZkELn4gFOD5KhJzg0w/Q3L2aowoVptCUG3IwdbMCone5q07ZRIsmS6LnkW0rlQqx hDHWbrjfMecHHcvmBIlXua1hur3BVhxkdB7i7tM3TJNpA1RVLg6rCiBie/A9qWQT1AXzm6f0ocyEl jY4tr0iuTPkCNB9nb2BDtpB7QWV6SWTWuNoEmN0Voc/JZaB9aex248eInsTXwzBDdFYfkvsTZa9H4 rnHGupiX9+A/CmuoIJtTXFNnKR77JuwNJoSrLkp66TOdBWzt1HjHV1HUdpFv/0+2VtgjJy8PyJqvT ynT3JKz+Q==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hGkIb-0002bS-QI; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:25 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70] helo=foss.arm.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hGkIY-0002af-2o for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:08:23 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256AB374; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:08:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.162.0.144] (a075553-lin.blr.arm.com [10.162.0.144]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6279E3F59C; Wed, 17 Apr 2019 06:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] KVM: arm64: Add a vcpu flag to control ptrauth for guest To: Marc Zyngier , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <1555039236-10608-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> <1555039236-10608-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:38:13 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190417_060822_125304_C1791C5D X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.13 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Andrew Jones , Julien Thierry , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Christoffer Dall , Kristina Martsenko , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Dave Martin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On 4/17/19 2:05 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 12/04/2019 04:20, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> A per vcpu flag is added to check if pointer authentication is >> enabled for the vcpu or not. This flag may be enabled according to >> the necessary user policies and host capabilities. >> >> This patch also adds a helper to check the flag. >> >> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap >> Cc: Mark Rutland >> Cc: Marc Zyngier >> Cc: Christoffer Dall >> Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu >> --- >> >> Changes since v8: >> * Added a new per vcpu flag which will store Pointer Authentication enable >> status instead of checking them again. [Dave Martin] >> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> index 9d57cf8..31dbc7c 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h >> @@ -355,10 +355,14 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch { >> #define KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_ENABLED (1 << 4) /* SVE enabled for EL0 */ >> #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE (1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */ >> #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED (1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */ >> +#define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH (1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */ >> >> #define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \ >> ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE)) >> >> +#define vcpu_has_ptrauth(vcpu) \ >> + ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH) >> + > > Just as for SVE, please first check that the system has PTRAUTH. > Something like: > > (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_GENERIC_AUTH_ARCH) && \ > ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH)) In the subsequent patches, vcpu->arch.flags is only set to KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH when all host capability check conditions matches such as system_supports_address_auth(), system_supports_generic_auth() so doing them again is repetitive in my view. Thanks, Amit D > > This will save an extra load on unsuspecting CPUs thanks to the static > key embedded in the capability structure. > > Thanks, > > M. > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel