From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: "Anand Kumria" Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87k61yt1x2.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <455A1137.8030301@shadowen.org> <87hcx1u934.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87bqn9u43s.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7vbqn9y6w6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3b8ltq7r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061115201227.GM7201@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88-110-175-230.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com User-Agent: pan 0.117 (We'll fly and we'll fall and we'll burn) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkWQ4-0000In-7G for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:52:01 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031064AbWKPBv5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:51:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031061AbWKPBv5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:51:57 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41671 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031064AbWKPBv4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:51:56 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1GkWPb-0000AE-Ri for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:51:33 +0100 Received: from 88-110-175-230.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com ([88.110.175.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:51:31 +0100 Received: from wildfire by 88-110-175-230.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 02:51:31 +0100 To: git@vger.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:26:44 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Petr Baudis wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 03:10:16AM CET, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > You have to admit both pull and fetch have been contaminated >> > with loaded meanings from different backgrounds. I was talking >> > about killing the source of confusion in the longer term by >> > removing fetch/pull/push, so we are still on the same page. >> >> How was/is fetch contaminated? > > I think "fetch" is sane. Its only problem is a missing symetrical > counterpart verb, like "get" and "put". "throw" ? But I think "I'll just 'throw' this set of patches at you" is a lot harshers sounding than "I'll just 'push' this set of patches at you". Anand