From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:06:54 +0100 Organization: At home Message-ID: References: <7vtzzfp86x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 29 19:04:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0M5b-0004sb-VC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:04:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965074AbWL2SEH (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:04:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965076AbWL2SEH (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:04:07 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:41378 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965074AbWL2SEG (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:04:06 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H0M5K-0008Mn-12 for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:04:02 +0100 Received: from host-81-190-24-56.torun.mm.pl ([81.190.24.56]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:04:02 +0100 Received: from jnareb by host-81-190-24-56.torun.mm.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:04:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: git@vger.kernel.org X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-81-190-24-56.torun.mm.pl Mail-Copies-To: jnareb@gmail.com User-Agent: KNode/0.10.2 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * jc/3way (Wed Nov 29 18:53:13 2006 -0800) 1 commit >> + git-merge: preserve and merge local changes when doing fast >> forward > > I'd like this, but behind a command line switch. And in addition to saying > "cannot merge, blabla needs update", git could spit out "if you want to > risk a 3way merge, go ahead and add the --preserve-local flag to > git-merge". > > Comments? Good idea. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git