From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA5AC433EF for ; Tue, 24 May 2022 19:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nta3a-0002L5-CN for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:19:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntZpU-0002cS-Ef for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:04:28 -0400 Received: from forwardcorp1p.mail.yandex.net ([2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b6:217]:33542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ntZpI-0005tS-7l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2022 15:04:26 -0400 Received: from myt6-79704c0e15e4.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-79704c0e15e4.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:239b:0:640:7970:4c0e]) by forwardcorp1p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B98082E12CD; Tue, 24 May 2022 22:04:08 +0300 (MSK) Received: from myt6-81d8ab6a9f9d.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-81d8ab6a9f9d.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c12:520a:0:640:81d8:ab6a]) by myt6-79704c0e15e4.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with ESMTP id lbEX1LRyNJ-47J8LDm5; Tue, 24 May 2022 22:04:08 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 2 Precedence: bulk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex-team.ru; s=default; t=1653419048; bh=vp5S5dxqYsJk0F2O/a0VA1enIbG1yVcbvNQHgyRuLRg=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:Date; b=VvnMuwAh/e+lbF8Nj1bNHOWKWBkNwH5hXdc+sSKDUGHaXpZVVG3xaYUiRNK0lOiW5 XuzMmTUQ30EOLQdwRszd3V5LUJz1FapiFroGV+R4q2BxZb0nPvQNX4++8dcfwNcdY7 C2OELkbGJkc7fRwQN1qE+B2gZ4uRYx9vBR87ZDtg= Authentication-Results: myt6-79704c0e15e4.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex-team.ru Received: from [IPV6:2a02:6b8:b081:b6b7::1:23] (unknown [2a02:6b8:b081:b6b7::1:23]) by myt6-81d8ab6a9f9d.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtpcorp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id qdU0J8FyE6-47NSjKGe; Tue, 24 May 2022 22:04:07 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 22:04:06 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] qdev: add DEVICE_RUNTIME_ERROR event Content-Language: en-US To: Konstantin Khlebnikov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: yc-core@yandex-team.ru, eblake@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster , mst@redhat.com, Denis Plotnikov References: <165296995578.196133.16183155555450040914.stgit@buzz> From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy In-Reply-To: <165296995578.196133.16183155555450040914.stgit@buzz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b6:217; envelope-from=vsementsov@yandex-team.ru; helo=forwardcorp1p.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" First, cover letter is absent. Konstantin, could you please provide a description what the whole series does? Second, add maintainers to CC: +Micheal +Eric +Markus On 5/19/22 17:19, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > This event represents device runtime errors to give time and > reason why device is broken. > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov > --- The patch itself seems good to me: Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy -- Best regards, Vladimir