From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3465E202F2 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753371AbdKWVYZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:24:25 -0500 Received: from wp156.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.163]:52534 "EHLO wp156.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752928AbdKWVYY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:24:24 -0500 Received: from p5099125b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([80.153.18.91] helo=[192.168.100.43]); authenticated by wp156.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1eHyyq-0006Le-Jb; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:24:20 +0100 Subject: Re: Unify annotated and non-annotated tags To: "Randall S. Becker" , techtonik@gmail.com Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org, igor.d.djordjevic@gmail.com References: <201711231458.vANEwUMK048049@elephants.elehost.com> <003c01d3646c$df78fc50$9e6af4f0$@nexbridge.com> From: Thomas Braun Message-ID: Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 22:24:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <003c01d3646c$df78fc50$9e6af4f0$@nexbridge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhause.de;1511472264;cd5b8f95; X-HE-SMSGID: 1eHyyq-0006Le-Jb Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Am 23.11.2017 um 16:08 schrieb Randall S. Becker: [...] >> So my proposal is to get rid of non-annotated tags, so to get all >> tags with commits that they point to, one would use: >> git for-each-ref --format='%(*objectname) %(refname)' refs/tags> >> For so-called non-annotated tags just leave the message empty. >> I don't see why anyone would need non-annotated tags though. I'm using exclusively non-annotated tags. Why? Because that is the default of "git tag" and I also, until now, never needed more than giving a commit a "name". Many annotated tag messages just repeat the tag name itself, so the message seems quite redundant to me. Just my 2 cents, Thomas