All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Hou Tao" <houtao1@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] block: fix use-after-free on cached last_lookup partition
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:05:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2f8b3c9-db6b-a5b3-5d0b-91ed65404048@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200109062109.2313-2-ming.lei@redhat.com>

Hi Guys,

Did this patch have been forgotten? So, ping...

Thanks,
Yufen


On 2020/1/9 14:21, Ming Lei wrote:
> delete_partition() clears the cached last_lookup partition. However
> the .last_lookup cache may be overwritten by one IO path after
> it is cleared from delete_partition(). Then another IO path may
> use the cached deleting partition after __delete_partition() is
> called, then use-after-free is triggered on the cached partition.
> 
> Fixes the issue by the following approach:
> 
> 1) always get the partition's refcount via hd_struct_try_get() before
> setting .last_lookup
> 
> 2) move clearing .last_lookup from delete_partition() to
> __delete_partition() which is release handle of the partition's
> percpu-refcount, so that no IO path can overwrite .last_lookup after it
> is cleared in __delete_partition().
> 
> It is one candidate approach of Yufen's patch[1] which adds overhead
> in fast path by indirect lookup which may introduce one extra cacheline
> in IO path. Also this patch relies on percpu-refcount's protection, and
> it is easier to understand and verify.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20200109013551.GB9655@ming.t460p/T/#t
> 
> Reported-by: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-core.c          | 12 ------------
>   block/genhd.c             |  6 +++++-
>   block/partition-generic.c | 10 +++++++++-
>   include/linux/genhd.h     |  1 +
>   4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index 089e890ab208..79599f5fd5b7 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1365,18 +1365,6 @@ void blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq, bool new_io)
>   		part_stat_inc(part, merges[rw]);
>   	} else {
>   		part = disk_map_sector_rcu(rq->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(rq));
> -		if (!hd_struct_try_get(part)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * The partition is already being removed,
> -			 * the request will be accounted on the disk only
> -			 *
> -			 * We take a reference on disk->part0 although that
> -			 * partition will never be deleted, so we can treat
> -			 * it as any other partition.
> -			 */
> -			part = &rq->rq_disk->part0;
> -			hd_struct_get(part);
> -		}
>   		part_inc_in_flight(rq->q, part, rw);
>   		rq->part = part;
>   	}
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index ff6268970ddc..6029c94510f0 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -286,17 +286,21 @@ struct hd_struct *disk_map_sector_rcu(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
>   	ptbl = rcu_dereference(disk->part_tbl);
>   
>   	part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->last_lookup);
> -	if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector))
> +	if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector) && hd_struct_try_get(part))
>   		return part;
>   
>   	for (i = 1; i < ptbl->len; i++) {
>   		part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[i]);
>   
>   		if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector)) {
> +			if (!hd_struct_try_get(part))
> +				goto exit;
>   			rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, part);
>   			return part;
>   		}
>   	}
> + exit:
> +	hd_struct_get(&disk->part0);
>   	return &disk->part0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disk_map_sector_rcu);
> diff --git a/block/partition-generic.c b/block/partition-generic.c
> index 1d20c9cf213f..1739f750dbf2 100644
> --- a/block/partition-generic.c
> +++ b/block/partition-generic.c
> @@ -262,6 +262,12 @@ static void delete_partition_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>   void __delete_partition(struct percpu_ref *ref)
>   {
>   	struct hd_struct *part = container_of(ref, struct hd_struct, ref);
> +	struct disk_part_tbl *ptbl =
> +		rcu_dereference_protected(part->disk->part_tbl, 1);
> +
> +	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
> +	put_device(disk_to_dev(part->disk));
> +
>   	INIT_RCU_WORK(&part->rcu_work, delete_partition_work_fn);
>   	queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &part->rcu_work);
>   }
> @@ -283,8 +289,9 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
>   	if (!part)
>   		return;
>   
> +	get_device(disk_to_dev(disk));
>   	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
> -	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
> +
>   	kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
>   	device_del(part_to_dev(part));
>   
> @@ -349,6 +356,7 @@ struct hd_struct *add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno,
>   	p->nr_sects = len;
>   	p->partno = partno;
>   	p->policy = get_disk_ro(disk);
> +	p->disk = disk;
>   
>   	if (info) {
>   		struct partition_meta_info *pinfo = alloc_part_info(disk);
> diff --git a/include/linux/genhd.h b/include/linux/genhd.h
> index 8bb63027e4d6..1b09cfe00aa3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/genhd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/genhd.h
> @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ struct hd_struct {
>   	struct disk_stats dkstats;
>   #endif
>   	struct percpu_ref ref;
> +	struct gendisk *disk;
>   	struct rcu_work rcu_work;
>   };
>   
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-21  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09  6:21 [PATCH 0/4] block: fix partition use-after-free and optimization Ming Lei
2020-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: fix use-after-free on cached last_lookup partition Ming Lei
2020-02-21  3:05   ` Yufen Yu [this message]
2020-02-21  4:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-02-21  7:47     ` Ming Lei
2020-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] block: only define 'nr_sects_seq' in hd_part for 32bit SMP Ming Lei
2020-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] block: re-organize fields of 'struct hd_part' Ming Lei
2020-01-09  6:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] block: don't hold part0's refcount in IO path Ming Lei
2020-05-07  8:52 [PATCH 0/4] block: fix partition use-after-free and optimization Ming Lei
2020-05-07  8:52 ` [PATCH 1/4] block: fix use-after-free on cached last_lookup partition Ming Lei
2020-05-07 14:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08  1:54     ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f2f8b3c9-db6b-a5b3-5d0b-91ed65404048@huawei.com \
    --to=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.