From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33279C169C4 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012A0218AF for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732289AbfAaL3o (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:29:44 -0500 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:19552 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726221AbfAaL3o (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 06:29:44 -0500 Received: from fsav109.sakura.ne.jp (fsav109.sakura.ne.jp [27.133.134.236]) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x0VBTgOk058633; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:29:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp (202.181.97.72) by fsav109.sakura.ne.jp (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav109.sakura.ne.jp); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:29:42 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/530/fsav109.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (softbank126126163036.bbtec.net [126.126.163.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by www262.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0VBTgJD058624 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:29:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp) Subject: Re: general protection fault in relay_open_buf To: Greg KH , Kees Cook Cc: Andrew Morton , syzbot , Eric Biggers , Souptick Joarder , LKML , David Rientjes , syzkaller-bugs Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel References: <00000000000074cbc30580b16bc3@google.com> <20190131105152.GB13686@kroah.com> From: Tetsuo Handa Message-ID: Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 20:29:37 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190131105152.GB13686@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/01/31 19:51, Greg KH wrote: > Can you test the patch below? You can ask syzbot to test the patch. But > @@ -461,7 +463,7 @@ static struct rchan_buf *relay_open_buf(struct rchan *chan, unsigned int cpu) > dentry = chan->cb->create_buf_file(NULL, NULL, > S_IRUSR, buf, > &chan->is_global); > - if (WARN_ON(dentry)) > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dentry)) > goto free_buf; are you trying to fix a different bug together that old code was by error bailing out when chan->cb->create_buf_file() returned a valid "struct dentry *" ? I don't know what WARN_ON() due to a valid "struct dentry *" means... > } > >