From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Jon Cargille <jcargill@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f37ab68c-61ce-b6fb-7a49-831bacfc7424@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVHcY6y1GmvGJnMg@google.com>
On 27/09/21 16:59, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> commit acd05785e48c01edb2c4f4d014d28478b5f19fb5
>> Author: David Matlack<dmatlack@google.com>
>> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 15:14:46 2020 -0700
>> Commit: Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> CommitDate: Fri Apr 24 12:53:17 2020 -0400
>>
>> kvm: add capability for halt polling
>>
>> broke the possibility for an admin to disable halt polling for already running KVM guests.
>> In past times doing
>> echo 0 > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/halt_poll_ns
>>
>> stopped polling system wide.
>> Now all KVM guests will use the halt_poll_ns value that was active during
>> startup - even those that do not use KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL.
>>
>> I guess this was not intended?
No, but...
> I would go so far as to say that halt_poll_ns should be a hard limit on
> the capability
... this would not be a good idea I think. Anything that wants to do a
lot of polling can just do "for (;;)".
So I think there are two possibilities that makes sense:
* track what is using KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL, and make writes to halt_poll_ns
follow that
* just make halt_poll_ns read-only.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Jon Cargille <jcargill@google.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f37ab68c-61ce-b6fb-7a49-831bacfc7424@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVHcY6y1GmvGJnMg@google.com>
On 27/09/21 16:59, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> commit acd05785e48c01edb2c4f4d014d28478b5f19fb5
>> Author: David Matlack<dmatlack@google.com>
>> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 15:14:46 2020 -0700
>> Commit: Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> CommitDate: Fri Apr 24 12:53:17 2020 -0400
>>
>> kvm: add capability for halt polling
>>
>> broke the possibility for an admin to disable halt polling for already running KVM guests.
>> In past times doing
>> echo 0 > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/halt_poll_ns
>>
>> stopped polling system wide.
>> Now all KVM guests will use the halt_poll_ns value that was active during
>> startup - even those that do not use KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL.
>>
>> I guess this was not intended?
No, but...
> I would go so far as to say that halt_poll_ns should be a hard limit on
> the capability
... this would not be a good idea I think. Anything that wants to do a
lot of polling can just do "for (;;)".
So I think there are two possibilities that makes sense:
* track what is using KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL, and make writes to halt_poll_ns
follow that
* just make halt_poll_ns read-only.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Jon Cargille <jcargill@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 17:03:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f37ab68c-61ce-b6fb-7a49-831bacfc7424@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVHcY6y1GmvGJnMg@google.com>
On 27/09/21 16:59, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> commit acd05785e48c01edb2c4f4d014d28478b5f19fb5
>> Author: David Matlack<dmatlack@google.com>
>> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 15:14:46 2020 -0700
>> Commit: Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> CommitDate: Fri Apr 24 12:53:17 2020 -0400
>>
>> kvm: add capability for halt polling
>>
>> broke the possibility for an admin to disable halt polling for already running KVM guests.
>> In past times doing
>> echo 0 > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/halt_poll_ns
>>
>> stopped polling system wide.
>> Now all KVM guests will use the halt_poll_ns value that was active during
>> startup - even those that do not use KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL.
>>
>> I guess this was not intended?
No, but...
> I would go so far as to say that halt_poll_ns should be a hard limit on
> the capability
... this would not be a good idea I think. Anything that wants to do a
lot of polling can just do "for (;;)".
So I think there are two possibilities that makes sense:
* track what is using KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL, and make writes to halt_poll_ns
follow that
* just make halt_poll_ns read-only.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Jon Cargille <jcargill@google.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@google.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:03:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f37ab68c-61ce-b6fb-7a49-831bacfc7424@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVHcY6y1GmvGJnMg@google.com>
On 27/09/21 16:59, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> commit acd05785e48c01edb2c4f4d014d28478b5f19fb5
>> Author: David Matlack<dmatlack@google.com>
>> AuthorDate: Fri Apr 17 15:14:46 2020 -0700
>> Commit: Paolo Bonzini<pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> CommitDate: Fri Apr 24 12:53:17 2020 -0400
>>
>> kvm: add capability for halt polling
>>
>> broke the possibility for an admin to disable halt polling for already running KVM guests.
>> In past times doing
>> echo 0 > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/halt_poll_ns
>>
>> stopped polling system wide.
>> Now all KVM guests will use the halt_poll_ns value that was active during
>> startup - even those that do not use KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL.
>>
>> I guess this was not intended?
No, but...
> I would go so far as to say that halt_poll_ns should be a hard limit on
> the capability
... this would not be a good idea I think. Anything that wants to do a
lot of polling can just do "for (;;)".
So I think there are two possibilities that makes sense:
* track what is using KVM_CAP_HALT_POLL, and make writes to halt_poll_ns
follow that
* just make halt_poll_ns read-only.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-25 0:55 [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 01/14] KVM: s390: Ensure kvm_arch_no_poll() is read once when blocking vCPU Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 6:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 02/14] KVM: Update halt-polling stats if and only if halt-polling was attempted Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 18:57 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 18:57 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 18:57 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 18:57 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 03/14] KVM: Refactor and document halt-polling stats update helper Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 19:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 19:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 19:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 04/14] KVM: Reconcile discrepancies in halt-polling stats Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 21:26 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 21:26 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 21:26 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 05/14] KVM: s390: Clear valid_wakeup in kvm_s390_handle_wait(), not in arch hook Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 06/14] KVM: Drop obsolete kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 6:58 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-28 21:28 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 21:28 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 21:28 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 07/14] KVM: Don't block+unblock when halt-polling is successful Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-25 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-25 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-25 9:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-26 6:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-26 6:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-26 6:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-26 6:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-26 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-26 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-26 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-26 9:02 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-27 17:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 17:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 17:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 17:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-28 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-28 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-28 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-28 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-30 9:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-30 9:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-30 9:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-30 9:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 08/14] KVM: x86: Tweak halt emulation helper names to free up kvm_vcpu_halt() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 21:59 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 21:59 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 21:59 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 09/14] KVM: Rename kvm_vcpu_block() => kvm_vcpu_halt() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 7:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:06 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-28 22:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:01 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 10/14] KVM: Split out a kvm_vcpu_block() helper from kvm_vcpu_halt() Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:41 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-28 22:03 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:03 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:03 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 11/14] KVM: stats: Add stat to detect if vcpu is currently blocking Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 22:04 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:04 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:04 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 12/14] KVM: Don't redo ktime_get() when calculating halt-polling stop/deadline Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 22:08 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:08 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:08 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 13/14] KVM: x86: Directly block (instead of "halting") UNINITIALIZED vCPUs Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 22:12 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:12 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:12 ` David Matlack
2021-09-25 0:55 ` [PATCH 14/14] KVM: x86: Invoke kvm_vcpu_block() directly for non-HALTED wait states Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-25 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-28 22:14 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:14 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:14 ` David Matlack
2021-09-28 22:14 ` David Matlack
2021-09-27 7:22 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:22 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new st Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:22 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 7:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 14:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 14:59 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 14:59 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 14:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 15:03 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-09-27 15:03 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 15:03 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 15:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 15:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 15:15 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 15:15 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 15:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 15:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 15:16 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 15:16 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 15:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 16:58 ` David Matlack
2021-09-27 16:58 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne David Matlack
2021-09-27 16:58 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) David Matlack
2021-09-27 16:58 ` David Matlack
2021-09-29 6:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-29 6:56 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-29 6:56 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-29 6:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-09-27 17:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 17:24 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 17:24 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 17:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-27 17:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 17:33 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 17:33 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) Sean Christopherson
2021-09-27 17:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-15 3:28 ` wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-15 3:28 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-15 3:28 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-15 3:28 ` wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-16 17:19 ` David Matlack
2022-11-16 17:19 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne David Matlack
2022-11-16 17:19 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) David Matlack
2022-11-16 17:19 ` David Matlack
2022-11-18 2:29 ` wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-18 2:29 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a ne wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-18 2:29 ` disabling halt polling broken? (was Re: [PATCH 00/14] KVM: Halt-polling fixes, cleanups and a new stat) wangyanan (Y)
2022-11-18 2:29 ` wangyanan (Y)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f37ab68c-61ce-b6fb-7a49-831bacfc7424@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jcargill@google.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.