From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.yoctoproject.org (mail.yoctoproject.org [198.145.29.25]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.4931.1620203002616933698 for ; Wed, 05 May 2021 01:23:22 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=neutral (domain: crashcourse.ca, ip: 198.145.29.25, mailfrom: rpjday@crashcourse.ca) Received: from cpanel8.indieserve.net (cpanel8.indieserve.net [199.212.143.3]) by mail.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1887838C04F0 for ; Wed, 5 May 2021 08:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpeac202e043973-cmac202e043970.sdns.net.rogers.com ([174.114.107.13]:37926 helo=fedora) by cpanel8.indieserve.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1leCoQ-0000JP-FF; Wed, 05 May 2021 04:23:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 04:23:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" To: akuster808 cc: Yocto discussion list Subject: Re: [yocto] what OE/YP layers should be considered "supported"? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel8.indieserve.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - yoctoproject.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crashcourse.ca X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cpanel8.indieserve.net: authenticated_id: rpjday+crashcourse.ca/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Authenticated-Sender: cpanel8.indieserve.net: rpjday@crashcourse.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 4 May 2021, akuster808 wrote: > Helllo Robert, > > On 5/4/21 2:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > related to something that richard purdie mentioned on the OE list, > > if one wanted to do a YP-wide "cleanup" of some indeterminate form, > > what are the layers that would be considered mandatory to cover in > > such a cleanup? > I don't have an context in the email you are referring to. Can you > include it please? Supported will mean different things to different > people. > > -Armin granted, that Q was a bit vague ... based on a suggestion of richard's, i was going to do an "audit" of OE/YP layers to see the effect of doing a particular minor cleanup, but it's not clear the requirement for wide-sweepingness that would represent a sufficient audit. would that necessarily cover every single layer identified at layers.openembedded.org? that seems a bit onerous. so is there some moderately vague definition of what constitutes a minimally representative collection of layers? rday