From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F87C433B4 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5457F611CE for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 12:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239225AbhDSMun (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:50:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52126 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233302AbhDSMum (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 08:50:42 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F28EC06174A for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id u14-20020a17090a1f0eb029014e38011b09so13625877pja.5 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:50:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7TKvJmzsH9D20DGAdvhIQlM6oKsR35aTwHy8EHHhxYI=; b=DN3uVmYtNtmif3eYXUp9+z4n7D9bHdEf40n5lE+p+apmPzQPofoDU1tDBJiPwB8Isq q4/ebEVv0OSlqpqn5ZUNQCwoT8a0MVvbcn9dLblz9DQqDsa5pu61FGsdedG4kGGGkUwK Z1cNXJJZb9HuzdnhBvg1COWcSMZzzkgtu33P41dYW/DJZc59m18BXxcP8exRXpRzr3A0 lNg3s3UAHMqSGgtcK0QvxWWSpkaU1/RTALwzP/c83cVCp6okDBJ4/3TUDongAi1YSr6L E6rhYevMgEeGXLsaWCCTwg0nFP83jawR1wdAvkDXL+e+wM4/eCc96NImDf23+OjiqL94 4fTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7TKvJmzsH9D20DGAdvhIQlM6oKsR35aTwHy8EHHhxYI=; b=OwxinJABn2P7B9t3W7TvZ6/V1qKKOOGZ5obGIEJRk6eD39Wcp2+XjTtkIkkp7qElxF 3xKzfhlXIEbAcnhVVMTO4IFRlS01joUL7abaK9mOCczwJ+VPMLjvyb8iyYM3cQNT9/oS 9TmQX1YSQ+taTJdUXibdpcoU6vUb2tRWV7CW2RCKmgn1Zyso0GRRkYAR9blnCIskeeH9 eKzJXFLhz+drQEwby5nqfk6GE2iDqYBei2F03Dqk24zPbMabH1UONDQVHh3Kdd0eHq7k +wRBjseIht8O1Zr6XQAI4QjB7KMUwqX9FtrEg3ZYrjg173jB9Cv6fDc4s04QoGlaE92w 3gJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533l7jBcdVLd5aaWLpMWPLz8JZvC/wxEc/Sv6rcIxJsYjtJpUN46 Nik+16U+I6ueZNFMwy2P/+s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxZB1SOgeDPvQFFYSb+y9Jn/SUVDdL/xTlio5jaNjJ2WDZ5wY1c93D41jM+9QY4SnxCcH0ZHA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a589:: with SMTP id b9mr20832668pjq.80.1618836611179; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs09a-223-255-225-75.three.co.id. [223.255.225.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z5sm4449831pff.191.2021.04.19.05.50.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Apr 2021 05:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Using --term-* with bisect breaks skip To: Trygve Aaberge Cc: Git Users , Miriam Rubio , Jeff King , Pranit Bauva , Christian Couder References: <20210418151459.GC10839@aaberge.net> <20210419083926.GD10839@aaberge.net> From: Bagas Sanjaya Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:50:07 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210419083926.GD10839@aaberge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 19/04/21 15.39, Trygve Aaberge wrote: > Right, the issue persists with those commands here too. So it apparently > happens as long as you don't use good/bad, but with good/bad it works as > expected. > Seems interesting, git bisect skip only works on good/bad terms but not on other terms (and not even on old/new) I saw similar test on t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh (hint: find test that test for skip) , but I don't know whether that test will pass. I CC'ed Christian Couder for now. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara